Interexaminer Reliability of Symptom-Provoking Active Sidebend, Rotation and Combined Movement Assessments of Patients with Low Back Pain

Kate Haswell, Maynard Williams, Wayne Hing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Symptom-provoking active movements can be useful assessments of patients with low back pain. They may give an early indication of the likelihood of chronicity and can also assist the clinician in selecting treatment interventions. Reliability data for such movements is incomplete. While symptom-provoking flexion and extension movements have consistently shown acceptable reliability and results for sidebend tests have suggested moderate reliability, results for symptom-provoking active rotation are variable and only one study has investigated the reliability of combined movements. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the interexaminer reliability of symptom-provoking active sidebend, rotation and combined movement assessments. Symptom-provoking movements were identified on the basis of aggravation or reproduction of the patient's pain complaint, that is, the symptoms for which the patient was seeking treatment. Pairs of therapists from a pool of four therapists independently examined patients with low back pain during a routine clinic visit. Percent agreement and Kappa values (95% Confidence Interval) for the movement assessments were sidebend 81.4% and 0.60 (0.40; 0.79), rotation 70% and 0.17 (-0.08; 0.42), sidebend-rotation 64.3% and 0.29 (0.06; 0.51), flexion-sidebend-rotation 70% and 0.39 (0.18; 0.61), and extension-sidebend-rotation 67.1% and 0.29 (0.06; 0.52). The majority of schemes described for the physical examination of patients with low back pain include symptom-provoking active sidebend, and findings from this study support the ongoing clinical use of this assessment. While symptom-provoking active rotation and combined movements were found to be unreliable, these assessments have been shown to have potential diagnostic value. Further research is warranted to investigate procedural changes that may improve reliability and to further investigate their diagnostic accuracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-20
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Reproducibility of Results
Ambulatory Care
Physical Examination
Reproduction
Confidence Intervals
Pain
Therapeutics
Research

Cite this

@article{518dd907a5c54e9996001e3f31e25bf0,
title = "Interexaminer Reliability of Symptom-Provoking Active Sidebend, Rotation and Combined Movement Assessments of Patients with Low Back Pain",
abstract = "Symptom-provoking active movements can be useful assessments of patients with low back pain. They may give an early indication of the likelihood of chronicity and can also assist the clinician in selecting treatment interventions. Reliability data for such movements is incomplete. While symptom-provoking flexion and extension movements have consistently shown acceptable reliability and results for sidebend tests have suggested moderate reliability, results for symptom-provoking active rotation are variable and only one study has investigated the reliability of combined movements. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the interexaminer reliability of symptom-provoking active sidebend, rotation and combined movement assessments. Symptom-provoking movements were identified on the basis of aggravation or reproduction of the patient's pain complaint, that is, the symptoms for which the patient was seeking treatment. Pairs of therapists from a pool of four therapists independently examined patients with low back pain during a routine clinic visit. Percent agreement and Kappa values (95{\%} Confidence Interval) for the movement assessments were sidebend 81.4{\%} and 0.60 (0.40; 0.79), rotation 70{\%} and 0.17 (-0.08; 0.42), sidebend-rotation 64.3{\%} and 0.29 (0.06; 0.51), flexion-sidebend-rotation 70{\%} and 0.39 (0.18; 0.61), and extension-sidebend-rotation 67.1{\%} and 0.29 (0.06; 0.52). The majority of schemes described for the physical examination of patients with low back pain include symptom-provoking active sidebend, and findings from this study support the ongoing clinical use of this assessment. While symptom-provoking active rotation and combined movements were found to be unreliable, these assessments have been shown to have potential diagnostic value. Further research is warranted to investigate procedural changes that may improve reliability and to further investigate their diagnostic accuracy.",
author = "Kate Haswell and Maynard Williams and Wayne Hing",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1179/106698104790825455",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "11--20",
journal = "Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy",
issn = "1066-9817",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Interexaminer Reliability of Symptom-Provoking Active Sidebend, Rotation and Combined Movement Assessments of Patients with Low Back Pain. / Haswell, Kate; Williams, Maynard; Hing, Wayne.

In: Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 11-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interexaminer Reliability of Symptom-Provoking Active Sidebend, Rotation and Combined Movement Assessments of Patients with Low Back Pain

AU - Haswell, Kate

AU - Williams, Maynard

AU - Hing, Wayne

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Symptom-provoking active movements can be useful assessments of patients with low back pain. They may give an early indication of the likelihood of chronicity and can also assist the clinician in selecting treatment interventions. Reliability data for such movements is incomplete. While symptom-provoking flexion and extension movements have consistently shown acceptable reliability and results for sidebend tests have suggested moderate reliability, results for symptom-provoking active rotation are variable and only one study has investigated the reliability of combined movements. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the interexaminer reliability of symptom-provoking active sidebend, rotation and combined movement assessments. Symptom-provoking movements were identified on the basis of aggravation or reproduction of the patient's pain complaint, that is, the symptoms for which the patient was seeking treatment. Pairs of therapists from a pool of four therapists independently examined patients with low back pain during a routine clinic visit. Percent agreement and Kappa values (95% Confidence Interval) for the movement assessments were sidebend 81.4% and 0.60 (0.40; 0.79), rotation 70% and 0.17 (-0.08; 0.42), sidebend-rotation 64.3% and 0.29 (0.06; 0.51), flexion-sidebend-rotation 70% and 0.39 (0.18; 0.61), and extension-sidebend-rotation 67.1% and 0.29 (0.06; 0.52). The majority of schemes described for the physical examination of patients with low back pain include symptom-provoking active sidebend, and findings from this study support the ongoing clinical use of this assessment. While symptom-provoking active rotation and combined movements were found to be unreliable, these assessments have been shown to have potential diagnostic value. Further research is warranted to investigate procedural changes that may improve reliability and to further investigate their diagnostic accuracy.

AB - Symptom-provoking active movements can be useful assessments of patients with low back pain. They may give an early indication of the likelihood of chronicity and can also assist the clinician in selecting treatment interventions. Reliability data for such movements is incomplete. While symptom-provoking flexion and extension movements have consistently shown acceptable reliability and results for sidebend tests have suggested moderate reliability, results for symptom-provoking active rotation are variable and only one study has investigated the reliability of combined movements. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the interexaminer reliability of symptom-provoking active sidebend, rotation and combined movement assessments. Symptom-provoking movements were identified on the basis of aggravation or reproduction of the patient's pain complaint, that is, the symptoms for which the patient was seeking treatment. Pairs of therapists from a pool of four therapists independently examined patients with low back pain during a routine clinic visit. Percent agreement and Kappa values (95% Confidence Interval) for the movement assessments were sidebend 81.4% and 0.60 (0.40; 0.79), rotation 70% and 0.17 (-0.08; 0.42), sidebend-rotation 64.3% and 0.29 (0.06; 0.51), flexion-sidebend-rotation 70% and 0.39 (0.18; 0.61), and extension-sidebend-rotation 67.1% and 0.29 (0.06; 0.52). The majority of schemes described for the physical examination of patients with low back pain include symptom-provoking active sidebend, and findings from this study support the ongoing clinical use of this assessment. While symptom-provoking active rotation and combined movements were found to be unreliable, these assessments have been shown to have potential diagnostic value. Further research is warranted to investigate procedural changes that may improve reliability and to further investigate their diagnostic accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842682020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/106698104790825455

DO - 10.1179/106698104790825455

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 11

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy

JF - Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy

SN - 1066-9817

IS - 1

ER -