Interexaminer reliability of orthopaedic special tests used in the assessment of shoulder pain

Angela Cadogan, Mark Laslett, Wayne Hing, Peter McNair, Maynard Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Orthopaedic special tests (OST) are commonly used in the assessment of the painful shoulder to assist to rule-in or rule-out specific pathology. A small number of tests with high levels of diagnostic accuracy have been identified but interexaminer reliability data is variable or lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the interexaminer reliability of a group of OST with demonstrated diagnostic accuracy at primary care level. Forty consecutive subjects with shoulder pain were recruited. Six tests were performed by two examiners (physiotherapists) on the same day. Tests included the active compression test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, drop-arm test, crank test, Kim test and belly-press test. 'Fair' reliability (kappa 0.36-0.38) was observed for the active compression test (labral pathology), Hawkins-Kennedy test and crank test. Prevalence of positive agreements was low for the active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), drop-arm test, Kim test and belly-press test. Prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) values indicated 'substantial' reliability (0.65-0.78) for these tests. The active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), belly-press tests (observation and weakness), Kim test and drop-arm test demonstrate acceptable levels of interexaminer reliability in a group of patients with sub-acute and chronic shoulder conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-5
Number of pages5
JournalManual Therapy
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shoulder Pain
Acromioclavicular Joint
Orthopedics
Arm
Pathology
Physical Therapists
Primary Health Care
Observation

Cite this

Cadogan, Angela ; Laslett, Mark ; Hing, Wayne ; McNair, Peter ; Williams, Maynard. / Interexaminer reliability of orthopaedic special tests used in the assessment of shoulder pain. In: Manual Therapy. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 131-5.
@article{cb2ea215fb0440168e95da402ccf94f1,
title = "Interexaminer reliability of orthopaedic special tests used in the assessment of shoulder pain",
abstract = "Orthopaedic special tests (OST) are commonly used in the assessment of the painful shoulder to assist to rule-in or rule-out specific pathology. A small number of tests with high levels of diagnostic accuracy have been identified but interexaminer reliability data is variable or lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the interexaminer reliability of a group of OST with demonstrated diagnostic accuracy at primary care level. Forty consecutive subjects with shoulder pain were recruited. Six tests were performed by two examiners (physiotherapists) on the same day. Tests included the active compression test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, drop-arm test, crank test, Kim test and belly-press test. 'Fair' reliability (kappa 0.36-0.38) was observed for the active compression test (labral pathology), Hawkins-Kennedy test and crank test. Prevalence of positive agreements was low for the active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), drop-arm test, Kim test and belly-press test. Prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) values indicated 'substantial' reliability (0.65-0.78) for these tests. The active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), belly-press tests (observation and weakness), Kim test and drop-arm test demonstrate acceptable levels of interexaminer reliability in a group of patients with sub-acute and chronic shoulder conditions.",
author = "Angela Cadogan and Mark Laslett and Wayne Hing and Peter McNair and Maynard Williams",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.math.2010.07.009",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "131--5",
journal = "Musculoskeletal Science and Practice",
issn = "1356-689X",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "2",

}

Interexaminer reliability of orthopaedic special tests used in the assessment of shoulder pain. / Cadogan, Angela; Laslett, Mark; Hing, Wayne; McNair, Peter; Williams, Maynard.

In: Manual Therapy, Vol. 16, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 131-5.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interexaminer reliability of orthopaedic special tests used in the assessment of shoulder pain

AU - Cadogan, Angela

AU - Laslett, Mark

AU - Hing, Wayne

AU - McNair, Peter

AU - Williams, Maynard

N1 - Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Orthopaedic special tests (OST) are commonly used in the assessment of the painful shoulder to assist to rule-in or rule-out specific pathology. A small number of tests with high levels of diagnostic accuracy have been identified but interexaminer reliability data is variable or lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the interexaminer reliability of a group of OST with demonstrated diagnostic accuracy at primary care level. Forty consecutive subjects with shoulder pain were recruited. Six tests were performed by two examiners (physiotherapists) on the same day. Tests included the active compression test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, drop-arm test, crank test, Kim test and belly-press test. 'Fair' reliability (kappa 0.36-0.38) was observed for the active compression test (labral pathology), Hawkins-Kennedy test and crank test. Prevalence of positive agreements was low for the active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), drop-arm test, Kim test and belly-press test. Prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) values indicated 'substantial' reliability (0.65-0.78) for these tests. The active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), belly-press tests (observation and weakness), Kim test and drop-arm test demonstrate acceptable levels of interexaminer reliability in a group of patients with sub-acute and chronic shoulder conditions.

AB - Orthopaedic special tests (OST) are commonly used in the assessment of the painful shoulder to assist to rule-in or rule-out specific pathology. A small number of tests with high levels of diagnostic accuracy have been identified but interexaminer reliability data is variable or lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the interexaminer reliability of a group of OST with demonstrated diagnostic accuracy at primary care level. Forty consecutive subjects with shoulder pain were recruited. Six tests were performed by two examiners (physiotherapists) on the same day. Tests included the active compression test, Hawkins-Kennedy test, drop-arm test, crank test, Kim test and belly-press test. 'Fair' reliability (kappa 0.36-0.38) was observed for the active compression test (labral pathology), Hawkins-Kennedy test and crank test. Prevalence of positive agreements was low for the active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), drop-arm test, Kim test and belly-press test. Prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) values indicated 'substantial' reliability (0.65-0.78) for these tests. The active compression test (acromioclavicular joint), belly-press tests (observation and weakness), Kim test and drop-arm test demonstrate acceptable levels of interexaminer reliability in a group of patients with sub-acute and chronic shoulder conditions.

U2 - 10.1016/j.math.2010.07.009

DO - 10.1016/j.math.2010.07.009

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 131

EP - 135

JO - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

JF - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice

SN - 1356-689X

IS - 2

ER -