Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Jenifer Liang, Michael J Abramson, Grant Russell, Anne E Holland, Nicholas A Zwar, Billie Bonevski, Ajay Mahal, Paula Eustace, Eldho Paul, Kirsten Phillips, Narelle S Cox, Sally Wilson, Johnson George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary, primary care-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 general practices in Australia. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged. 40 years with two or more clinic visits in the previous year were enrolled following spirometric confirmation of COPD. The model of care comprised smoking cessation support, home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase). Main outcomes included changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), dyspnoea, smoking abstinence and lung function at 6 and 12 months.

We identified 272 participants with COPD (157 intervention, 115 usual care); 49 (31%) out of 157 completed both HMR and HomeBase. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in SGRQ at 6 months (adjusted between-group difference 2.45 favouring intervention, 95% CI -0.89-5.79). Per protocol analyses showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in SGRQ in those receiving the full intervention compared to usual care (difference 5.22, 95% CI 0.19-10.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in change in CAT, dyspnoea, smoking abstinence or lung function.

No significant evidence was found for the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary model of care for COPD in primary care over usual care. Low uptake was a limitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1801530
Number of pages13
JournalThe European respiratory journal
Volume53
Issue number4
Early online date20 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Primary Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Lung
Smoking
Dyspnea
Rehabilitation
Intention to Treat Analysis
Smoking Cessation
Ambulatory Care
General Practice
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Liang, Jenifer ; Abramson, Michael J ; Russell, Grant ; Holland, Anne E ; Zwar, Nicholas A ; Bonevski, Billie ; Mahal, Ajay ; Eustace, Paula ; Paul, Eldho ; Phillips, Kirsten ; Cox, Narelle S ; Wilson, Sally ; George, Johnson. / Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care : a cluster randomised controlled trial. In: The European respiratory journal. 2019 ; Vol. 53, No. 4.
@article{ff365a4bd0384ffe846828f1574773ee,
title = "Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "We evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary, primary care-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 general practices in Australia. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged. 40 years with two or more clinic visits in the previous year were enrolled following spirometric confirmation of COPD. The model of care comprised smoking cessation support, home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase). Main outcomes included changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), dyspnoea, smoking abstinence and lung function at 6 and 12 months.We identified 272 participants with COPD (157 intervention, 115 usual care); 49 (31{\%}) out of 157 completed both HMR and HomeBase. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in SGRQ at 6 months (adjusted between-group difference 2.45 favouring intervention, 95{\%} CI -0.89-5.79). Per protocol analyses showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in SGRQ in those receiving the full intervention compared to usual care (difference 5.22, 95{\%} CI 0.19-10.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in change in CAT, dyspnoea, smoking abstinence or lung function.No significant evidence was found for the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary model of care for COPD in primary care over usual care. Low uptake was a limitation.",
author = "Jenifer Liang and Abramson, {Michael J} and Grant Russell and Holland, {Anne E} and Zwar, {Nicholas A} and Billie Bonevski and Ajay Mahal and Paula Eustace and Eldho Paul and Kirsten Phillips and Cox, {Narelle S} and Sally Wilson and Johnson George",
note = "Copyright {\circledC}ERS 2019.",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1183/13993003.01530-2018",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
journal = "European Journal of Respiratory Diseases",
issn = "0903-1936",
publisher = "EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD",
number = "4",

}

Liang, J, Abramson, MJ, Russell, G, Holland, AE, Zwar, NA, Bonevski, B, Mahal, A, Eustace, P, Paul, E, Phillips, K, Cox, NS, Wilson, S & George, J 2019, 'Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial' The European respiratory journal, vol. 53, no. 4, 1801530. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01530-2018

Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care : a cluster randomised controlled trial. / Liang, Jenifer; Abramson, Michael J; Russell, Grant; Holland, Anne E; Zwar, Nicholas A; Bonevski, Billie; Mahal, Ajay; Eustace, Paula; Paul, Eldho; Phillips, Kirsten; Cox, Narelle S; Wilson, Sally; George, Johnson.

In: The European respiratory journal, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1801530, 01.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interdisciplinary COPD intervention in primary care

T2 - a cluster randomised controlled trial

AU - Liang, Jenifer

AU - Abramson, Michael J

AU - Russell, Grant

AU - Holland, Anne E

AU - Zwar, Nicholas A

AU - Bonevski, Billie

AU - Mahal, Ajay

AU - Eustace, Paula

AU - Paul, Eldho

AU - Phillips, Kirsten

AU - Cox, Narelle S

AU - Wilson, Sally

AU - George, Johnson

N1 - Copyright ©ERS 2019.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - We evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary, primary care-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 general practices in Australia. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged. 40 years with two or more clinic visits in the previous year were enrolled following spirometric confirmation of COPD. The model of care comprised smoking cessation support, home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase). Main outcomes included changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), dyspnoea, smoking abstinence and lung function at 6 and 12 months.We identified 272 participants with COPD (157 intervention, 115 usual care); 49 (31%) out of 157 completed both HMR and HomeBase. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in SGRQ at 6 months (adjusted between-group difference 2.45 favouring intervention, 95% CI -0.89-5.79). Per protocol analyses showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in SGRQ in those receiving the full intervention compared to usual care (difference 5.22, 95% CI 0.19-10.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in change in CAT, dyspnoea, smoking abstinence or lung function.No significant evidence was found for the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary model of care for COPD in primary care over usual care. Low uptake was a limitation.

AB - We evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary, primary care-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 general practices in Australia. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged. 40 years with two or more clinic visits in the previous year were enrolled following spirometric confirmation of COPD. The model of care comprised smoking cessation support, home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase). Main outcomes included changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), dyspnoea, smoking abstinence and lung function at 6 and 12 months.We identified 272 participants with COPD (157 intervention, 115 usual care); 49 (31%) out of 157 completed both HMR and HomeBase. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in SGRQ at 6 months (adjusted between-group difference 2.45 favouring intervention, 95% CI -0.89-5.79). Per protocol analyses showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in SGRQ in those receiving the full intervention compared to usual care (difference 5.22, 95% CI 0.19-10.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in change in CAT, dyspnoea, smoking abstinence or lung function.No significant evidence was found for the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary model of care for COPD in primary care over usual care. Low uptake was a limitation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065310135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1183/13993003.01530-2018

DO - 10.1183/13993003.01530-2018

M3 - Article

VL - 53

JO - European Journal of Respiratory Diseases

JF - European Journal of Respiratory Diseases

SN - 0903-1936

IS - 4

M1 - 1801530

ER -