Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Jonathan Crowe’s chapter considers the relationship between three pivotal concepts in contemporary natural law thinking: practical reason, intelligibility and the common good. The so-called new natural law theorists, such as Germain Grisez and John Finnis, argue that there is a plurality of basic goods that render human action intelligible. The intelligibility of an action, on this view, is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for its reasonableness. However, the new natural law theorists have relatively little to say about what it means for an action to be intelligible or unintelligible. Crowe builds on this picture to argue that actions are intelligible or unintelligible relative to a context of social practices. This understanding of intelligibility, he argues, reveals an important connection between the basic goods and the common good. The common good, understood as the project of creating a society that enables all its members to pursue flourishing lives, not only facilitates participation in the basic goods, but makes the goods possible. It does this by creating a context within which judgments can be made about the intelligibility of human conduct.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Natural Law Theory
EditorsJonathan Crowe, Constance Youngwon Lee
Place of PublicationCheltenham
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter18
Pages296-303
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9781788110044
ISBN (Print)9781788110037
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Intelligibility
Practical Reason
Natural Law
Theorists
Reasonableness
Render
Participation
Flourishing
Human Action
Social Practice
Plurality

Cite this

Crowe, J. (2019). Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good. In J. Crowe, & C. Y. Lee (Eds.), Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory (pp. 296-303). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110044.00026
Crowe, Jonathan. / Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good. Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory . editor / Jonathan Crowe ; Constance Youngwon Lee. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. pp. 296-303
@inbook{db7dab2fd99042269c3642e440a447c7,
title = "Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good",
abstract = "Jonathan Crowe’s chapter considers the relationship between three pivotal concepts in contemporary natural law thinking: practical reason, intelligibility and the common good. The so-called new natural law theorists, such as Germain Grisez and John Finnis, argue that there is a plurality of basic goods that render human action intelligible. The intelligibility of an action, on this view, is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for its reasonableness. However, the new natural law theorists have relatively little to say about what it means for an action to be intelligible or unintelligible. Crowe builds on this picture to argue that actions are intelligible or unintelligible relative to a context of social practices. This understanding of intelligibility, he argues, reveals an important connection between the basic goods and the common good. The common good, understood as the project of creating a society that enables all its members to pursue flourishing lives, not only facilitates participation in the basic goods, but makes the goods possible. It does this by creating a context within which judgments can be made about the intelligibility of human conduct.",
author = "Jonathan Crowe",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4337/9781788110044.00026",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781788110037",
pages = "296--303",
editor = "Jonathan Crowe and Lee, {Constance Youngwon}",
booktitle = "Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Crowe, J 2019, Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good. in J Crowe & CY Lee (eds), Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory . Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 296-303. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110044.00026

Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good. / Crowe, Jonathan.

Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory . ed. / Jonathan Crowe; Constance Youngwon Lee. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. p. 296-303.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Jonathan Crowe’s chapter considers the relationship between three pivotal concepts in contemporary natural law thinking: practical reason, intelligibility and the common good. The so-called new natural law theorists, such as Germain Grisez and John Finnis, argue that there is a plurality of basic goods that render human action intelligible. The intelligibility of an action, on this view, is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for its reasonableness. However, the new natural law theorists have relatively little to say about what it means for an action to be intelligible or unintelligible. Crowe builds on this picture to argue that actions are intelligible or unintelligible relative to a context of social practices. This understanding of intelligibility, he argues, reveals an important connection between the basic goods and the common good. The common good, understood as the project of creating a society that enables all its members to pursue flourishing lives, not only facilitates participation in the basic goods, but makes the goods possible. It does this by creating a context within which judgments can be made about the intelligibility of human conduct.

AB - Jonathan Crowe’s chapter considers the relationship between three pivotal concepts in contemporary natural law thinking: practical reason, intelligibility and the common good. The so-called new natural law theorists, such as Germain Grisez and John Finnis, argue that there is a plurality of basic goods that render human action intelligible. The intelligibility of an action, on this view, is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for its reasonableness. However, the new natural law theorists have relatively little to say about what it means for an action to be intelligible or unintelligible. Crowe builds on this picture to argue that actions are intelligible or unintelligible relative to a context of social practices. This understanding of intelligibility, he argues, reveals an important connection between the basic goods and the common good. The common good, understood as the project of creating a society that enables all its members to pursue flourishing lives, not only facilitates participation in the basic goods, but makes the goods possible. It does this by creating a context within which judgments can be made about the intelligibility of human conduct.

U2 - 10.4337/9781788110044.00026

DO - 10.4337/9781788110044.00026

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781788110037

SP - 296

EP - 303

BT - Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory

A2 - Crowe, Jonathan

A2 - Lee, Constance Youngwon

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

CY - Cheltenham

ER -

Crowe J. Intelligibility, Practical Reason and the Common Good. In Crowe J, Lee CY, editors, Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2019. p. 296-303 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110044.00026