Inspiring or undermining confidence? Amendments to the right to judge alone trials in the ACT

Jodie O'Leary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The article focuses on the legislative amendments to the right to judge alone trials in Australian Capital Territory called the Criminal Proceedings Legislation Amendment Bill 2011. It mentions that the bill removes the right to trial by judge alone for serious offenses in the area like homicide. It says that the amendments are considered not compatible with the right to a fair trial under the Human Rights Act 2004 (HRA). It states that Chief Justice Higgins and others raise their concern about the legislation's incompatibility with human rights and its possible implications including prejudice, publicity, and infringement of the ability of the accused to be heard by an independent and impartial court.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-48
Number of pages19
JournalCanberra Law Review
Volume10
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

amendment
confidence
human rights
legislation
criminal proceedings
incompatibility
publicity
accused
bill
prejudice
homicide
justice
act
offense
ability

Cite this

@article{37acf447bfbc4e5b82c81784178d4f22,
title = "Inspiring or undermining confidence? Amendments to the right to judge alone trials in the ACT",
abstract = "The article focuses on the legislative amendments to the right to judge alone trials in Australian Capital Territory called the Criminal Proceedings Legislation Amendment Bill 2011. It mentions that the bill removes the right to trial by judge alone for serious offenses in the area like homicide. It says that the amendments are considered not compatible with the right to a fair trial under the Human Rights Act 2004 (HRA). It states that Chief Justice Higgins and others raise their concern about the legislation's incompatibility with human rights and its possible implications including prejudice, publicity, and infringement of the ability of the accused to be heard by an independent and impartial court.",
author = "Jodie O'Leary",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "30--48",
journal = "Canberra Law Review",
issn = "1320-6702",
number = "3",

}

Inspiring or undermining confidence? Amendments to the right to judge alone trials in the ACT. / O'Leary, Jodie.

In: Canberra Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.12.2011, p. 30-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inspiring or undermining confidence? Amendments to the right to judge alone trials in the ACT

AU - O'Leary, Jodie

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The article focuses on the legislative amendments to the right to judge alone trials in Australian Capital Territory called the Criminal Proceedings Legislation Amendment Bill 2011. It mentions that the bill removes the right to trial by judge alone for serious offenses in the area like homicide. It says that the amendments are considered not compatible with the right to a fair trial under the Human Rights Act 2004 (HRA). It states that Chief Justice Higgins and others raise their concern about the legislation's incompatibility with human rights and its possible implications including prejudice, publicity, and infringement of the ability of the accused to be heard by an independent and impartial court.

AB - The article focuses on the legislative amendments to the right to judge alone trials in Australian Capital Territory called the Criminal Proceedings Legislation Amendment Bill 2011. It mentions that the bill removes the right to trial by judge alone for serious offenses in the area like homicide. It says that the amendments are considered not compatible with the right to a fair trial under the Human Rights Act 2004 (HRA). It states that Chief Justice Higgins and others raise their concern about the legislation's incompatibility with human rights and its possible implications including prejudice, publicity, and infringement of the ability of the accused to be heard by an independent and impartial court.

UR - https://www.canberra.edu.au/about-uc/faculties/busgovlaw/about-us/school-of-law/the-canberra-law-review

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 30

EP - 48

JO - Canberra Law Review

JF - Canberra Law Review

SN - 1320-6702

IS - 3

ER -