Abstract
In this chapter Petherick provides an overview to logic, and the role of induction and deduction in profiling. Far from being of peripheral relevance to the subject, the application of logic and reasoning is central to the differences between profiling methods, with some relying on statistical assumptions to provide a composite of the crime, and others relying more strictly on crime scene information, such as physical evidence, and what this can tell us about what happened. Examples are provided where relevant throughout to show the application of the logic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues |
| Editors | W Petherick |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Pages | 17-35 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Edition | 3rd |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781455731749 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Induction and deduction in criminal profiling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 3 Citations
- 1 Scholarly edition
-
Profiling and serial crime: Theoretical and practical Issues
Petherick, W. (Editor), 2014, 3rd ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier. 449 p.Research output: Book/Report › Scholarly edition › Research › peer-review
8 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver