Induction and deduction in criminal profiling

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this chapter Petherick provides an overview to logic, and the role of induction and deduction in profiling. Far from being of peripheral relevance to the subject, the application of logic and reasoning is central to the differences between profiling methods, with some relying on statistical assumptions to provide a composite of the crime, and others relying more strictly on crime scene information, such as physical evidence, and what this can tell us about what happened. Examples are provided where relevant throughout to show the application of the logic.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProfiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues
EditorsW Petherick
PublisherElsevier
Pages17-35
Number of pages19
Edition3rd
ISBN (Print)9781455731749
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

deduction
induction
offense
evidence

Cite this

Petherick, W. (2013). Induction and deduction in criminal profiling. In W. Petherick (Ed.), Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues (3rd ed., pp. 17-35). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00002-1
Petherick, Wayne. / Induction and deduction in criminal profiling. Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. editor / W Petherick. 3rd. ed. Elsevier, 2013. pp. 17-35
@inbook{46c0c7fd8f2041058f925e976cdcd2c6,
title = "Induction and deduction in criminal profiling",
abstract = "In this chapter Petherick provides an overview to logic, and the role of induction and deduction in profiling. Far from being of peripheral relevance to the subject, the application of logic and reasoning is central to the differences between profiling methods, with some relying on statistical assumptions to provide a composite of the crime, and others relying more strictly on crime scene information, such as physical evidence, and what this can tell us about what happened. Examples are provided where relevant throughout to show the application of the logic.",
author = "Wayne Petherick",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00002-1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781455731749",
pages = "17--35",
editor = "W Petherick",
booktitle = "Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues",
publisher = "Elsevier",
address = "Netherlands",
edition = "3rd",

}

Petherick, W 2013, Induction and deduction in criminal profiling. in W Petherick (ed.), Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. 3rd edn, Elsevier, pp. 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00002-1

Induction and deduction in criminal profiling. / Petherick, Wayne.

Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. ed. / W Petherick. 3rd. ed. Elsevier, 2013. p. 17-35.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Induction and deduction in criminal profiling

AU - Petherick, Wayne

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - In this chapter Petherick provides an overview to logic, and the role of induction and deduction in profiling. Far from being of peripheral relevance to the subject, the application of logic and reasoning is central to the differences between profiling methods, with some relying on statistical assumptions to provide a composite of the crime, and others relying more strictly on crime scene information, such as physical evidence, and what this can tell us about what happened. Examples are provided where relevant throughout to show the application of the logic.

AB - In this chapter Petherick provides an overview to logic, and the role of induction and deduction in profiling. Far from being of peripheral relevance to the subject, the application of logic and reasoning is central to the differences between profiling methods, with some relying on statistical assumptions to provide a composite of the crime, and others relying more strictly on crime scene information, such as physical evidence, and what this can tell us about what happened. Examples are provided where relevant throughout to show the application of the logic.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902028569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00002-1

DO - 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00002-1

M3 - Other chapter contribution

SN - 9781455731749

SP - 17

EP - 35

BT - Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues

A2 - Petherick, W

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Petherick W. Induction and deduction in criminal profiling. In Petherick W, editor, Profiling and Serial Crime: Theoretical and Practical Issues. 3rd ed. Elsevier. 2013. p. 17-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4557-3174-9.00002-1