Abstract
In 2010 The Human Rights Committee of the United Nations (the UNHCR) made rulings on two "communications" submitted by Australian citizens, Robert Fardon and Ken Tillman, about what they contended was the unlawfulness of their preventive detention in Queensland and New South Wales respectively. The UNHCR upheld their applications and declared their detention unlawful by virtue of its constituting a breach of Article 9, paragraph 1, Article 14, paragraph 1, and Article 15, paragraph 1, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The decision has major ramifications for the preventive detention systems in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia. It provides a fillip for a new rehabilitative, non-penitential focus for such regimes and raises ethical issues for mental health practitioners currently functioning in and advising in relation to such systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 345-354 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Indefinite detention of sex offenders and human rights: The intervention of the human rights committee of the United Nations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver