Indefinite detention of sex offenders and human rights: The intervention of the human rights committee of the United Nations

S. C. Ian Freckelton, Patrick Keyzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2010 The Human Rights Committee of the United Nations (the UNHCR) made rulings on two "communications" submitted by Australian citizens, Robert Fardon and Ken Tillman, about what they contended was the unlawfulness of their preventive detention in Queensland and New South Wales respectively. The UNHCR upheld their applications and declared their detention unlawful by virtue of its constituting a breach of Article 9, paragraph 1, Article 14, paragraph 1, and Article 15, paragraph 1, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The decision has major ramifications for the preventive detention systems in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, and Western Australia. It provides a fillip for a new rehabilitative, non-penitential focus for such regimes and raises ethical issues for mental health practitioners currently functioning in and advising in relation to such systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-354
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Indefinite detention of sex offenders and human rights: The intervention of the human rights committee of the United Nations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this