INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of stroke clinical practice guidelines and acceptance by therapists that guidelines contain 'best practice' recommendations, compliance remains low. While previous studies have explored barriers associated with implementing rehabilitation guidelines in general, it remains unknown if these barriers are applicable to upper limb rehabilitation specifically. To plan effective implementation activities, key motivators and barriers to use should be identified.
METHOD: To investigate occupational and physiotherapists' perceptions of motivators and barriers to using upper limb clinical practice guideline recommendations in stroke rehabilitation, a mixed-method study was conducted. Using an online survey and semi-structured focus groups, physiotherapists and occupational therapists working in one of six stroke rehabilitation teams in Melbourne, Australia were invited to participate. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and thematic coding of free-text responses. Focus groups were transcribed, thematically coded and mapped against the Theoretical Domains Framework.
RESULTS: Forty-six participants completed the survey and 29 participated in the focus groups. Key motivators to use guideline recommendations included past experience with specific interventions, availability of required resources and an enabling workplace culture. Barriers included: limited training/skills in specific interventions, the complexity of intervention protocols, and beliefs about intervention effectiveness. Lack of accountability was highlighted and therapists perceived they are rarely checked for quality assurance purposes regarding guideline adherence.
CONCLUSION: Therapists identified that both motivators and barriers to implementing best-practice upper limb rehabilitation occur largely at the levels of the individual and the environment. As such, intervention efforts should focus at both these levels to facilitate change.
|Number of pages||14|
|Journal||Australian Occupational Therapy Journal|
|Early online date||23 Jul 2019|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Oct 2019|