Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research: Implications for creating knowledge

Dirk S. Hovorka

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The problem identification-design-build-evaluate-theorize structure of design science research has been proposed as an approach to creating knowledge in information systems and in broader organizational and social domains. Although the approach has merit, the philosophical foundations of two specific components warrant attention. First, the grounding of design theory on potentially incommensurate kernel theories may produce incoherent design theory. In addition, design theory has no strong logical connection to kernel theories, and so cannot be used to test or validate the contributing kernel theories. Second, the philosophical grounding of evaluation may inadvertently shift from functionally based measures of utility and efficiency, to evaluation based on the pragmatic fulfillment of multidimensional human actions as people encounter information systems, resulting in evaluation errors. Although design and evaluation from a single paradigm is not desirable, sufficient, or representative of design science research, multi-paradigm grounding of design and evaluation must be realized and used consciously by the research community if the design science approach is to remain a legitimate approach to knowledge creation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHuman Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings
Pages13-27
Number of pages15
Volume318
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Publication series

NameIFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
Volume318
ISSN (Print)18684238

Fingerprint

Paradigm
Incommensurability
Design science research
Evaluation
Kernel
Design theory
Information systems
Identification problem
Knowledge creation
Design science
Logic
Warrants
Design/build

Cite this

Hovorka, D. S. (2010). Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research: Implications for creating knowledge. In Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings (Vol. 318, pp. 13-27). (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Vol. 318). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12113-5_2
Hovorka, Dirk S. / Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research : Implications for creating knowledge. Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings. Vol. 318 2010. pp. 13-27 (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology).
@inproceedings{d6f75ef17733410eb291ce4fe4d51fbe,
title = "Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research: Implications for creating knowledge",
abstract = "The problem identification-design-build-evaluate-theorize structure of design science research has been proposed as an approach to creating knowledge in information systems and in broader organizational and social domains. Although the approach has merit, the philosophical foundations of two specific components warrant attention. First, the grounding of design theory on potentially incommensurate kernel theories may produce incoherent design theory. In addition, design theory has no strong logical connection to kernel theories, and so cannot be used to test or validate the contributing kernel theories. Second, the philosophical grounding of evaluation may inadvertently shift from functionally based measures of utility and efficiency, to evaluation based on the pragmatic fulfillment of multidimensional human actions as people encounter information systems, resulting in evaluation errors. Although design and evaluation from a single paradigm is not desirable, sufficient, or representative of design science research, multi-paradigm grounding of design and evaluation must be realized and used consciously by the research community if the design science approach is to remain a legitimate approach to knowledge creation.",
author = "Hovorka, {Dirk S.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-642-12113-5_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783642121128",
volume = "318",
series = "IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology",
pages = "13--27",
booktitle = "Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings",

}

Hovorka, DS 2010, Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research: Implications for creating knowledge. in Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings. vol. 318, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 318, pp. 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12113-5_2

Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research : Implications for creating knowledge. / Hovorka, Dirk S.

Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings. Vol. 318 2010. p. 13-27 (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Vol. 318).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research

T2 - Implications for creating knowledge

AU - Hovorka, Dirk S.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The problem identification-design-build-evaluate-theorize structure of design science research has been proposed as an approach to creating knowledge in information systems and in broader organizational and social domains. Although the approach has merit, the philosophical foundations of two specific components warrant attention. First, the grounding of design theory on potentially incommensurate kernel theories may produce incoherent design theory. In addition, design theory has no strong logical connection to kernel theories, and so cannot be used to test or validate the contributing kernel theories. Second, the philosophical grounding of evaluation may inadvertently shift from functionally based measures of utility and efficiency, to evaluation based on the pragmatic fulfillment of multidimensional human actions as people encounter information systems, resulting in evaluation errors. Although design and evaluation from a single paradigm is not desirable, sufficient, or representative of design science research, multi-paradigm grounding of design and evaluation must be realized and used consciously by the research community if the design science approach is to remain a legitimate approach to knowledge creation.

AB - The problem identification-design-build-evaluate-theorize structure of design science research has been proposed as an approach to creating knowledge in information systems and in broader organizational and social domains. Although the approach has merit, the philosophical foundations of two specific components warrant attention. First, the grounding of design theory on potentially incommensurate kernel theories may produce incoherent design theory. In addition, design theory has no strong logical connection to kernel theories, and so cannot be used to test or validate the contributing kernel theories. Second, the philosophical grounding of evaluation may inadvertently shift from functionally based measures of utility and efficiency, to evaluation based on the pragmatic fulfillment of multidimensional human actions as people encounter information systems, resulting in evaluation errors. Although design and evaluation from a single paradigm is not desirable, sufficient, or representative of design science research, multi-paradigm grounding of design and evaluation must be realized and used consciously by the research community if the design science approach is to remain a legitimate approach to knowledge creation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949620599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-12113-5_2

DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-12113-5_2

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783642121128

VL - 318

T3 - IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

SP - 13

EP - 27

BT - Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings

ER -

Hovorka DS. Incommensurability and multi-paradigm grounding in design science research: Implications for creating knowledge. In Human Benefit through the Diffusion of Information Systems Design Science Research: IFIP WG 8.2/8.6 International Working Conference, Perth, Australia, March 30 - April 1, 2010. Proceedings. Vol. 318. 2010. p. 13-27. (IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12113-5_2