Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a review of recent trials

Rebecca K Webster, Jeremy Howick, Tammy Hoffmann, Helen Macdonald, Gary S Collins, Jonathan L Rees, Vitaly Napadow, Claire Madigan, Amy Price, Sarah Lamb, Felicity Bishop, Klara Bokelmann, Andrew Papanikitas, Nia Roberts, Andrea Wm Evers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poorly described placebo/sham controls inhibit appraisal of active intervention benefits and harms. The 12-item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was developed to improve the reporting of active intervention components. The extent to which TIDieR is used to guide description of placebo or sham control is not known.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined all placebo/sham-controlled randomised trials published in 2018 in the top six general medical journals. We reported how many of the TIDieR checklist items they used to describe the placebo/sham control(s). We supplemented this with a sample of 100 placebo/sham-controlled trials from any journal, and searched Google Scholar to identify placebo/sham-controlled trials citing TIDieR.

RESULTS: We identified 94 placebo/sham-controlled trials published in the top journals in 2018; none reported using TIDieR. On average 8 items were addressed, with placebo/sham control name (100%) and when and how much was administered (97.9%) most commonly reported. Some items (rationale, 8.5%, whether there were modifications, 25.5%) were less often reported. In our sample of less well cited journals, reporting was poorer (average of 6 items) and followed a similar pattern. Since TIDieR's first publication, six placebo-controlled trials have cited it according to Google Scholar; two of these used the checklist to describe placebo controls.

CONCLUSIONS: Placebo and sham controls are poorly described within randomised trials, and TIDieR is rarely used to guide these descriptions. We recommend developing guidelines to promote better descriptions of placebo/sham control components within clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13169
Pages (from-to)e13169
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation
Early online date13 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2019

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Webster, R. K., Howick, J., Hoffmann, T., Macdonald, H., Collins, G. S., Rees, J. L., ... Evers, A. W. (2019). Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a review of recent trials. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, e13169. [13169]. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13169