In defence of the doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

413 Downloads (Pure)


This article examines the doctrine of forum non conveniens as applied in Hong Kong, Australia, the US and Sweden, and considers the criticism that has been raised against the doctrine. The author argues that some of this criticism is valid, some of it is valid only in relation to some countries’ application of the doctrine, and some of the criticism is unfounded. The author concludes that the test applied in Hong Kong and most other common law jurisdictions - the clearly or distinctly more appropriate forum test - is the better option. The author goes on to make a number of other recommendations regarding the application of the doctrine, including the suggestion that the doctrine would benefit from being implemented in legislation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-420
Number of pages26
JournalHong Kong Law Journal
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2005


Dive into the research topics of 'In defence of the doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this