Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: An International Survey of Researchers

William R Phillips, Elizabeth Sturgiss, Liesbeth Hunik, Paul Glasziou, Tim Olde Hartman, Aaron Orkin, Joanne Reeve, Grant M Russell, Chris van Weel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess opportunities to improve reporting of primary care (PC) research to better meet the needs of its varied users.

METHODS: International, interprofessional online survey of PC researchers and users, 2018 to 2019. Respondents used Likert scales to rate frequency of difficulties in interpreting, synthesizing, and applying PC research reports. Free-text short answers were categorized by template analysis to record experiences, concerns, and suggestions. Areas of need were checked across existing reporting guidelines.

RESULTS: Survey yielded 255 respondents across 24 nations, including 138 women (54.1%), 169 physicians (60%), 32 scientists (11%), 20 educators (7%), and 18 public health professionals (6%). Overall, 37.4% indicated difficulties using PC research reports "50% or more of the time." The most common problems were synthesizing findings (58%) and assessing generalizability (42%). Difficulty was reported by 49% for qualitative, 46% for mixed methods, and 38% for observational research. Most users wanted richer reporting of theoretical foundation (53.7%); teams, roles, and organization of care (53.4%); and patient involvement in the research process (52.7%). Few reported difficulties with ethics or disclosure of funding or conflicts. Free-text answers described special challenges in reporting PC research: context of clinical care and setting; practical details of interventions; patient-clinician and team relationships; and generalizability, applicability and impact in the great variety of PC settings. Cross-check showed that few current reporting guidelines focus on these needs.

CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve the reporting of PC research to make it more useful for its many users, suggesting a role for a PC research reporting guideline.


© Copyright 2021 by the American Board of Family Medicine.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-21
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: An International Survey of Researchers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this