Improving the effectiveness of clinical medicine: The need for better science

Ian A. Scott, Paul P. Glasziou

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective clinical practice is predicated on valid and relevant clinical science - a commodity in increasingly short supply. The pre-eminent place of clinical research has become tainted by methodological shortcomings, commercial influences and neglect of the needs of patients and clinicians. Researchers need to be more proactive in evaluating clinical interventions in terms of patient-important benefit, wide applicability and comparative effectiveness, and in adopting study designs and reporting standards that ensure accurate and transparent research outputs. Funders of research need to be more supportive of applied clinical research that rigorously evaluates effectiveness of new treatments and synthesises existing knowledge into clinically useful systematic reviews. Several strategies for improving the state of the science are possible but their implementation requires collective action of all those undertaking and reporting clinical research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-308
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume196
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Clinical Medicine
Research
Research Personnel

Cite this

@article{b6755a1ae270435c8921dfc84804d2e7,
title = "Improving the effectiveness of clinical medicine: The need for better science",
abstract = "Effective clinical practice is predicated on valid and relevant clinical science - a commodity in increasingly short supply. The pre-eminent place of clinical research has become tainted by methodological shortcomings, commercial influences and neglect of the needs of patients and clinicians. Researchers need to be more proactive in evaluating clinical interventions in terms of patient-important benefit, wide applicability and comparative effectiveness, and in adopting study designs and reporting standards that ensure accurate and transparent research outputs. Funders of research need to be more supportive of applied clinical research that rigorously evaluates effectiveness of new treatments and synthesises existing knowledge into clinically useful systematic reviews. Several strategies for improving the state of the science are possible but their implementation requires collective action of all those undertaking and reporting clinical research.",
author = "Scott, {Ian A.} and Glasziou, {Paul P.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
doi = "10.5694/mja11.10364",
language = "English",
volume = "196",
pages = "304--308",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD",
number = "5",

}

Improving the effectiveness of clinical medicine : The need for better science. / Scott, Ian A.; Glasziou, Paul P.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 196, No. 5, 03.2012, p. 304-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the effectiveness of clinical medicine

T2 - The need for better science

AU - Scott, Ian A.

AU - Glasziou, Paul P.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Effective clinical practice is predicated on valid and relevant clinical science - a commodity in increasingly short supply. The pre-eminent place of clinical research has become tainted by methodological shortcomings, commercial influences and neglect of the needs of patients and clinicians. Researchers need to be more proactive in evaluating clinical interventions in terms of patient-important benefit, wide applicability and comparative effectiveness, and in adopting study designs and reporting standards that ensure accurate and transparent research outputs. Funders of research need to be more supportive of applied clinical research that rigorously evaluates effectiveness of new treatments and synthesises existing knowledge into clinically useful systematic reviews. Several strategies for improving the state of the science are possible but their implementation requires collective action of all those undertaking and reporting clinical research.

AB - Effective clinical practice is predicated on valid and relevant clinical science - a commodity in increasingly short supply. The pre-eminent place of clinical research has become tainted by methodological shortcomings, commercial influences and neglect of the needs of patients and clinicians. Researchers need to be more proactive in evaluating clinical interventions in terms of patient-important benefit, wide applicability and comparative effectiveness, and in adopting study designs and reporting standards that ensure accurate and transparent research outputs. Funders of research need to be more supportive of applied clinical research that rigorously evaluates effectiveness of new treatments and synthesises existing knowledge into clinically useful systematic reviews. Several strategies for improving the state of the science are possible but their implementation requires collective action of all those undertaking and reporting clinical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859118792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja11.10364

DO - 10.5694/mja11.10364

M3 - Review article

VL - 196

SP - 304

EP - 308

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 5

ER -