### Abstract

A traditional measure of effect size associated with tests for difference between two groups is the variance explained by group membership (R-2). If exposure to a disease causes a small but long term deficit in performance, however, R-2 does not capture that cumulating effect. We propose an alternative statistic, gamma, based on the probability of an unexposed person outperforming an exposed person. Although gamma is also a point estimate, it more easily conveys what the cumulating effect of a deficit would be. We discuss some of the advantages of this measure. Copyright (C) 2000 John WiIey & Sons, Ltd.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 1295-1302 |

Number of pages | 8 |

Journal | Statistics in Medicine |

Volume | 19 |

Issue number | 10 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 30 May 2000 |

Externally published | Yes |

### Cite this

*Statistics in Medicine*,

*19*(10), 1295-1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000530)19:10<1295::AID-SIM493>3.0.CO;2-Z

}

*Statistics in Medicine*, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1295-1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000530)19:10<1295::AID-SIM493>3.0.CO;2-Z

**Improving interpretability : Gamma as an alternative to R-2 as a measure of effect size.** / Reidpath, Daniel D; Diamond, Mark R; Hartel, Gunter; Glasziou, P.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving interpretability

T2 - Gamma as an alternative to R-2 as a measure of effect size

AU - Reidpath, Daniel D

AU - Diamond, Mark R

AU - Hartel, Gunter

AU - Glasziou, P

PY - 2000/5/30

Y1 - 2000/5/30

N2 - A traditional measure of effect size associated with tests for difference between two groups is the variance explained by group membership (R-2). If exposure to a disease causes a small but long term deficit in performance, however, R-2 does not capture that cumulating effect. We propose an alternative statistic, gamma, based on the probability of an unexposed person outperforming an exposed person. Although gamma is also a point estimate, it more easily conveys what the cumulating effect of a deficit would be. We discuss some of the advantages of this measure. Copyright (C) 2000 John WiIey & Sons, Ltd.

AB - A traditional measure of effect size associated with tests for difference between two groups is the variance explained by group membership (R-2). If exposure to a disease causes a small but long term deficit in performance, however, R-2 does not capture that cumulating effect. We propose an alternative statistic, gamma, based on the probability of an unexposed person outperforming an exposed person. Although gamma is also a point estimate, it more easily conveys what the cumulating effect of a deficit would be. We discuss some of the advantages of this measure. Copyright (C) 2000 John WiIey & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000530)19:10<1295::AID-SIM493>3.0.CO;2-Z

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000530)19:10<1295::AID-SIM493>3.0.CO;2-Z

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1295

EP - 1302

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 10

ER -