Impact of various clothing variations on firefighter mobility: A pilot study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract: Firefighter clothing is known to restrict movement and increase the risk of musculoskeletal injury. The aim of this study was to investigate dierences between clothing variations and firefighter mobility. Data were collected from eight firefighters using a randomized counterbalanced, repeated measures, design. Three dierent clothing variants (V1–V3) in addition to current station wear (S) were trialed. Combinations of S and V1 (SV1) and V2 (SV2) were also trialed. Outcome measures included: standing reach height; the Functional Movement Screen [FMS]; vertical jump; a visual analogue scale [VAS] for the FMS, vertical jump, step ups and crawl; and a mannequin sketch to mark
areas of discomfort. V3 was preferred over S in all tasks and performed better both objectively (FMS and vertical jump) and subjectively (VAS scores). While V1 was typically associated with poorer performance, the impacts of V1 and V2 when compared to each other and S varied depending on the tasks performed. This variation was greater when V1 or V2 were worn with S (SV1 and SV2). Areas of discomfort across all variations was the knees, followed by the thighs. Clothing that has the least impact on, or improves, mobility (especially around the lower limbs) may help reduce firefighter injury and limit subjective discomfort.
Original languageEnglish
Article number78
JournalSafety
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Firefighters
Clothing
Visual Analog Scale
Manikins
Wounds and Injuries
Thigh
Lower Extremity
Knee
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

@article{cb21d75739ae4c8fba070571a88cb125,
title = "Impact of various clothing variations on firefighter mobility: A pilot study",
abstract = "Abstract: Firefighter clothing is known to restrict movement and increase the risk of musculoskeletal injury. The aim of this study was to investigate dierences between clothing variations and firefighter mobility. Data were collected from eight firefighters using a randomized counterbalanced, repeated measures, design. Three dierent clothing variants (V1–V3) in addition to current station wear (S) were trialed. Combinations of S and V1 (SV1) and V2 (SV2) were also trialed. Outcome measures included: standing reach height; the Functional Movement Screen [FMS]; vertical jump; a visual analogue scale [VAS] for the FMS, vertical jump, step ups and crawl; and a mannequin sketch to markareas of discomfort. V3 was preferred over S in all tasks and performed better both objectively (FMS and vertical jump) and subjectively (VAS scores). While V1 was typically associated with poorer performance, the impacts of V1 and V2 when compared to each other and S varied depending on the tasks performed. This variation was greater when V1 or V2 were worn with S (SV1 and SV2). Areas of discomfort across all variations was the knees, followed by the thighs. Clothing that has the least impact on, or improves, mobility (especially around the lower limbs) may help reduce firefighter injury and limit subjective discomfort.",
author = "Orr, {Rob Marc} and Vini Simas and Elisa Canetti and Daniel Maupin and Ben Schram",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3390/safety5040078",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Safety",
issn = "2313-576X",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "4",

}

Impact of various clothing variations on firefighter mobility : A pilot study. / Orr, Rob Marc; Simas, Vini; Canetti, Elisa; Maupin, Daniel; Schram, Ben.

In: Safety, Vol. 5, No. 4, 78, 31.10.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of various clothing variations on firefighter mobility

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Orr, Rob Marc

AU - Simas, Vini

AU - Canetti, Elisa

AU - Maupin, Daniel

AU - Schram, Ben

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - Abstract: Firefighter clothing is known to restrict movement and increase the risk of musculoskeletal injury. The aim of this study was to investigate dierences between clothing variations and firefighter mobility. Data were collected from eight firefighters using a randomized counterbalanced, repeated measures, design. Three dierent clothing variants (V1–V3) in addition to current station wear (S) were trialed. Combinations of S and V1 (SV1) and V2 (SV2) were also trialed. Outcome measures included: standing reach height; the Functional Movement Screen [FMS]; vertical jump; a visual analogue scale [VAS] for the FMS, vertical jump, step ups and crawl; and a mannequin sketch to markareas of discomfort. V3 was preferred over S in all tasks and performed better both objectively (FMS and vertical jump) and subjectively (VAS scores). While V1 was typically associated with poorer performance, the impacts of V1 and V2 when compared to each other and S varied depending on the tasks performed. This variation was greater when V1 or V2 were worn with S (SV1 and SV2). Areas of discomfort across all variations was the knees, followed by the thighs. Clothing that has the least impact on, or improves, mobility (especially around the lower limbs) may help reduce firefighter injury and limit subjective discomfort.

AB - Abstract: Firefighter clothing is known to restrict movement and increase the risk of musculoskeletal injury. The aim of this study was to investigate dierences between clothing variations and firefighter mobility. Data were collected from eight firefighters using a randomized counterbalanced, repeated measures, design. Three dierent clothing variants (V1–V3) in addition to current station wear (S) were trialed. Combinations of S and V1 (SV1) and V2 (SV2) were also trialed. Outcome measures included: standing reach height; the Functional Movement Screen [FMS]; vertical jump; a visual analogue scale [VAS] for the FMS, vertical jump, step ups and crawl; and a mannequin sketch to markareas of discomfort. V3 was preferred over S in all tasks and performed better both objectively (FMS and vertical jump) and subjectively (VAS scores). While V1 was typically associated with poorer performance, the impacts of V1 and V2 when compared to each other and S varied depending on the tasks performed. This variation was greater when V1 or V2 were worn with S (SV1 and SV2). Areas of discomfort across all variations was the knees, followed by the thighs. Clothing that has the least impact on, or improves, mobility (especially around the lower limbs) may help reduce firefighter injury and limit subjective discomfort.

U2 - 10.3390/safety5040078

DO - 10.3390/safety5040078

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Safety

JF - Safety

SN - 2313-576X

IS - 4

M1 - 78

ER -