If the legislature had been serious about data privacy...

Christopher Kuner, Fred H. Cate, Orla Lynskey, Nora Ni Loideain, Christopher Millard, Dan Jerker B Svantesson

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

Abstract

[Extract] It is approximately a year since the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force, sparking an unprecedented data privacy frenzy. It has been celebrated, and it has been feared. It has been seen as going too far, and it has been seen as not going far enough.1 Perhaps it is a rather safe bet to predict that the true impact—which still remains to become crystallized—will fall somewhere in between these extremes. But one thing we already know with great certainty is that the GDPR’s impact will be felt, indeed is being felt, far beyond the borders of Europe.

Furthermore, law makers around the globe—from Argentina to New Zealand, and from Kenya to Thailand—are now busying themselves with legislative initiatives replicating the GDPR. Consequently, this may seem a strange time to question the sincerity of the general will to tackle the data privacy concerns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-77
JournalInternational Data Privacy Law
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

data protection
privacy
regulation
Kenya
Argentina
New Zealand
Law
time

Cite this

Kuner, Christopher ; Cate, Fred H. ; Lynskey, Orla ; Loideain, Nora Ni ; Millard, Christopher ; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. / If the legislature had been serious about data privacy... In: International Data Privacy Law. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 75-77.
@article{9bc2162e9c7f4a85bbd21a6f1d6e8c06,
title = "If the legislature had been serious about data privacy...",
abstract = "[Extract] It is approximately a year since the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force, sparking an unprecedented data privacy frenzy. It has been celebrated, and it has been feared. It has been seen as going too far, and it has been seen as not going far enough.1 Perhaps it is a rather safe bet to predict that the true impact—which still remains to become crystallized—will fall somewhere in between these extremes. But one thing we already know with great certainty is that the GDPR’s impact will be felt, indeed is being felt, far beyond the borders of Europe.Furthermore, law makers around the globe—from Argentina to New Zealand, and from Kenya to Thailand—are now busying themselves with legislative initiatives replicating the GDPR. Consequently, this may seem a strange time to question the sincerity of the general will to tackle the data privacy concerns.",
author = "Christopher Kuner and Cate, {Fred H.} and Orla Lynskey and Loideain, {Nora Ni} and Christopher Millard and Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1093/idpl/ipz006",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "75--77",
journal = "International Data Privacy Law",
issn = "2044-3994",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Kuner, C, Cate, FH, Lynskey, O, Loideain, NN, Millard, C & Svantesson, DJB 2019, 'If the legislature had been serious about data privacy...', International Data Privacy Law, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 75-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz006

If the legislature had been serious about data privacy... / Kuner, Christopher; Cate, Fred H. ; Lynskey, Orla; Loideain, Nora Ni; Millard, Christopher; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 9, No. 2, 29.07.2019, p. 75-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - If the legislature had been serious about data privacy...

AU - Kuner, Christopher

AU - Cate, Fred H.

AU - Lynskey, Orla

AU - Loideain, Nora Ni

AU - Millard, Christopher

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2019/7/29

Y1 - 2019/7/29

N2 - [Extract] It is approximately a year since the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force, sparking an unprecedented data privacy frenzy. It has been celebrated, and it has been feared. It has been seen as going too far, and it has been seen as not going far enough.1 Perhaps it is a rather safe bet to predict that the true impact—which still remains to become crystallized—will fall somewhere in between these extremes. But one thing we already know with great certainty is that the GDPR’s impact will be felt, indeed is being felt, far beyond the borders of Europe.Furthermore, law makers around the globe—from Argentina to New Zealand, and from Kenya to Thailand—are now busying themselves with legislative initiatives replicating the GDPR. Consequently, this may seem a strange time to question the sincerity of the general will to tackle the data privacy concerns.

AB - [Extract] It is approximately a year since the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) came into force, sparking an unprecedented data privacy frenzy. It has been celebrated, and it has been feared. It has been seen as going too far, and it has been seen as not going far enough.1 Perhaps it is a rather safe bet to predict that the true impact—which still remains to become crystallized—will fall somewhere in between these extremes. But one thing we already know with great certainty is that the GDPR’s impact will be felt, indeed is being felt, far beyond the borders of Europe.Furthermore, law makers around the globe—from Argentina to New Zealand, and from Kenya to Thailand—are now busying themselves with legislative initiatives replicating the GDPR. Consequently, this may seem a strange time to question the sincerity of the general will to tackle the data privacy concerns.

U2 - 10.1093/idpl/ipz006

DO - 10.1093/idpl/ipz006

M3 - Editorial

VL - 9

SP - 75

EP - 77

JO - International Data Privacy Law

JF - International Data Privacy Law

SN - 2044-3994

IS - 2

ER -