TY - JOUR
T1 - Hunting and gathering
T2 - New imperatives in mapping and collecting student learning data to assure quality outcomes
AU - Lawson, Romy
AU - Taylor, Tracy
AU - French, Erica
AU - Fallshaw, Eveline
AU - Hall, Cathy
AU - Kinash, Shelley
AU - Summers, Jane
PY - 2015/5/4
Y1 - 2015/5/4
N2 - Assurance of learning (AOL) is a quality enhancement and quality assurance process used in higher education. It involves a process of determining programme learning outcomes and standards, and systematically gathering evidence to measure students' performance on these. The systematic assessment of whole-of-programme outcomes provides a basis for curriculum development and management, continuous improvement, and accreditation. To better understand how AOL processes operate, a national study of university practices across one discipline area, business and management, was undertaken. To solicit data on AOL practice, interviews were undertaken with a sample of business school representatives (n = 25). Two key processes emerged: (1) mapping of graduate attributes and (2) collection of assurance data. External drivers such as professional accreditation and government legislation were the primary reasons for undertaking AOL outcomes but intrinsic motivators in relation to continuous improvement were also evident. The facilitation of academic commitment was achieved through an embedded approach to AOL by the majority of universities in the study. A sustainable and inclusive process of AOL was seen to support wider stakeholder engagement in the development of higher education learning outcomes.
AB - Assurance of learning (AOL) is a quality enhancement and quality assurance process used in higher education. It involves a process of determining programme learning outcomes and standards, and systematically gathering evidence to measure students' performance on these. The systematic assessment of whole-of-programme outcomes provides a basis for curriculum development and management, continuous improvement, and accreditation. To better understand how AOL processes operate, a national study of university practices across one discipline area, business and management, was undertaken. To solicit data on AOL practice, interviews were undertaken with a sample of business school representatives (n = 25). Two key processes emerged: (1) mapping of graduate attributes and (2) collection of assurance data. External drivers such as professional accreditation and government legislation were the primary reasons for undertaking AOL outcomes but intrinsic motivators in relation to continuous improvement were also evident. The facilitation of academic commitment was achieved through an embedded approach to AOL by the majority of universities in the study. A sustainable and inclusive process of AOL was seen to support wider stakeholder engagement in the development of higher education learning outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930576981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2014.911249
DO - 10.1080/07294360.2014.911249
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930576981
SN - 0729-4360
VL - 34
SP - 581
EP - 595
JO - Higher Education Research and Development
JF - Higher Education Research and Development
IS - 3
ER -