Human resource practices in Hong Kong and Singapore: The impact of political forces and imitation proceses

James Benjamin Shaw, Paul S Kirkbride, Cynthia D Fisher, Sara F. Y. Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the influence of political forces and imitation processes on HR practices in local and foreign firms in Singapore and Hong Kong. Hong Kong has long practised a policy of positive non-interventionism while Singapore's government has taken a far more interventionist role not only on broad issues of economic policy but on HRM activities as well. Singapore's government has focused heavily on productivity improvement, including the development of incentive pay systems and more effective performance appraisal systems. Singapore firms use more extensive personnel selection procedures and more sophisticated methods of assessing employee performance and determining wage rates. On the other hand, the Hong Kong government has centred its policies around training and development activities. Higher levels of in-house training and formal orientation programs were found in Hong Kong firms. That HR practices seem to reflect the different government approaches is particularly so for locally owned firms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-39
Number of pages18
JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 1995

Fingerprint

Human resource practices
Government
Hong Kong
Singapore
Imitation
HR practices
Productivity improvement
Economic policy
Employee performance
Training and development
Personnel selection
Incentive pay
Wage rate
Foreign firms
Performance appraisal

Cite this

@article{2872ed7d27d64621b9ef5ed7f95ef647,
title = "Human resource practices in Hong Kong and Singapore: The impact of political forces and imitation proceses",
abstract = "This study examined the influence of political forces and imitation processes on HR practices in local and foreign firms in Singapore and Hong Kong. Hong Kong has long practised a policy of positive non-interventionism while Singapore's government has taken a far more interventionist role not only on broad issues of economic policy but on HRM activities as well. Singapore's government has focused heavily on productivity improvement, including the development of incentive pay systems and more effective performance appraisal systems. Singapore firms use more extensive personnel selection procedures and more sophisticated methods of assessing employee performance and determining wage rates. On the other hand, the Hong Kong government has centred its policies around training and development activities. Higher levels of in-house training and formal orientation programs were found in Hong Kong firms. That HR practices seem to reflect the different government approaches is particularly so for locally owned firms.",
author = "Shaw, {James Benjamin} and Kirkbride, {Paul S} and Fisher, {Cynthia D} and Tang, {Sara F. Y.}",
year = "1995",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/103841119503300102",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "22--39",
journal = "Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources",
issn = "1032-3627",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Human resource practices in Hong Kong and Singapore : The impact of political forces and imitation proceses. / Shaw, James Benjamin; Kirkbride, Paul S; Fisher, Cynthia D; Tang, Sara F. Y. .

In: Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.09.1995, p. 22-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human resource practices in Hong Kong and Singapore

T2 - The impact of political forces and imitation proceses

AU - Shaw, James Benjamin

AU - Kirkbride, Paul S

AU - Fisher, Cynthia D

AU - Tang, Sara F. Y.

PY - 1995/9/1

Y1 - 1995/9/1

N2 - This study examined the influence of political forces and imitation processes on HR practices in local and foreign firms in Singapore and Hong Kong. Hong Kong has long practised a policy of positive non-interventionism while Singapore's government has taken a far more interventionist role not only on broad issues of economic policy but on HRM activities as well. Singapore's government has focused heavily on productivity improvement, including the development of incentive pay systems and more effective performance appraisal systems. Singapore firms use more extensive personnel selection procedures and more sophisticated methods of assessing employee performance and determining wage rates. On the other hand, the Hong Kong government has centred its policies around training and development activities. Higher levels of in-house training and formal orientation programs were found in Hong Kong firms. That HR practices seem to reflect the different government approaches is particularly so for locally owned firms.

AB - This study examined the influence of political forces and imitation processes on HR practices in local and foreign firms in Singapore and Hong Kong. Hong Kong has long practised a policy of positive non-interventionism while Singapore's government has taken a far more interventionist role not only on broad issues of economic policy but on HRM activities as well. Singapore's government has focused heavily on productivity improvement, including the development of incentive pay systems and more effective performance appraisal systems. Singapore firms use more extensive personnel selection procedures and more sophisticated methods of assessing employee performance and determining wage rates. On the other hand, the Hong Kong government has centred its policies around training and development activities. Higher levels of in-house training and formal orientation programs were found in Hong Kong firms. That HR practices seem to reflect the different government approaches is particularly so for locally owned firms.

U2 - 10.1177/103841119503300102

DO - 10.1177/103841119503300102

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 22

EP - 39

JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

SN - 1032-3627

IS - 1

ER -