How ‘Shades of Failure’ and Mental Simulation Affect the Likelihood of Subsequent Actions

Anirban Som, Mark T. Spence, Natalina Zlatevska

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Literature in sequential choice categorizes focal actions and reactions as either goal consistent or inconsistent. In practice, there are shades of consistency: some actions are greater failures than are others. Based on three inter-related studies, we empirically demonstrate that the likelihood of performing subsequent actions is affected by the extent of failure of the current action; and, that this effect is moderated by a process mental simulation versus an outcome simulation prime.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationACR Proceedings
Subtitle of host publicationAP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research
Place of PublicationDuluth, MN
PublisherAssociation for Consumer Research
Pages228-236
Number of pages9
Volume10
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How ‘Shades of Failure’ and Mental Simulation Affect the Likelihood of Subsequent Actions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Som, A., Spence, M. T., & Zlatevska, N. (2012). How ‘Shades of Failure’ and Mental Simulation Affect the Likelihood of Subsequent Actions. In ACR Proceedings: AP - Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 10, pp. 228-236). Association for Consumer Research. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/1011168/volumes/ap11/AP-10