Abstract
The passage of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act means the US federal government is committed to implementing a comparative-effectiveness research agenda. Since then, there have been wide-ranging debates around almost every element of comparative-effectiveness research.1-3 An issue that has so far remained under-explored is the role of physicians. This role and how physicians might be involved in comparative-effectiveness research are important considerations. As front-line service providers, physicians have a considerable stake in how comparative-effectiveness research mechanisms are constructed, in leading collegial buy-in to associated processes, and in implementing recommendations through their clinical activities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-94 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | American Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How physicians can drive comparative-effectiveness research: Lessons from New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver