Abstract
To estimate the benefits of treatments other than antibiotics for acute sore throat, and the differences between non-antibiotic interventions and controls in patient-perceived pain of sore throat, a systematic review of controlled trials in Medline and the Cochrane Library was carried out. Sixty-six randomised controlled trials (with or without additional antibiotics) were identified and 17 met the selection criteria. Twenty-two non-antibiotic managements for sore throat were compared. Their efficacy relative to placebo ranged from no effect to 93%. Some non-antibiotic treatments may be more effective than antibiotics; however, publication bias may have exaggerated the benefits. These treatments should be investigated further with respect to efficacy, safety, and side-effects as potential firstline management options for acute sore throat.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 817-820 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | British Journal of General Practice |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue number | 459 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How effective are treatments other than antibiotics for acute sore throat?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver