How do general practitioners and patients make decisions about cardiovascular disease risk?

Carissa Bonner, Jesse Jansen, Shannon McKinn, Les Irwig, Jenny Doust, Paul Glasziou, Kirsten McCaffery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although current guidelines around the world recommend using absolute risk (AR) thresholds to decide whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk should be managed with lifestyle or medication, the use of AR in clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence general practitioner (GP) and patient decision making about CVD risk management, including the role of risk perception. Methods: Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 25 GPs and 38 patients in Australia in 2011-2012. Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded and a Framework Analysis method was used. Results: GPs rarely mentioned AR thresholds but were influenced by their subjective perception of the patient's risk and motivation, and their own attitudes toward prevention, including concerns about medication side effects and the efficacy of lifestyle change. Patients were influenced by individual risk factors, their own motivation to change lifestyle, and attitudes toward medication: initially negative, but this improved if medication was more effective than lifestyle. High perceived risk led to medication being recommended by GPs and accepted by patients, but this was not necessarily based on AR. Patient perceptions of high risk also increased motivation to change lifestyle, particularly if they were resistant to the idea of taking medication. Conclusions: Perceived risk, motivation, and attitudes appeared to be more important than AR thresholds in this study. CVD risk management guidelines could be more useful if they include strategies to help GPs consider patients' risk perception, motivation, and attitudes as well as evidence-based recommendations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-261
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

General Practitioners
Cardiovascular Diseases
Life Style
Motivation
Risk Management
Disease Management
Guidelines
Decision Making
Interviews

Cite this

Bonner, Carissa ; Jansen, Jesse ; McKinn, Shannon ; Irwig, Les ; Doust, Jenny ; Glasziou, Paul ; McCaffery, Kirsten. / How do general practitioners and patients make decisions about cardiovascular disease risk?. In: Health Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 253-261.
@article{11217b64766e4423bd928c61aee4920b,
title = "How do general practitioners and patients make decisions about cardiovascular disease risk?",
abstract = "Objective: Although current guidelines around the world recommend using absolute risk (AR) thresholds to decide whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk should be managed with lifestyle or medication, the use of AR in clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence general practitioner (GP) and patient decision making about CVD risk management, including the role of risk perception. Methods: Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 25 GPs and 38 patients in Australia in 2011-2012. Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded and a Framework Analysis method was used. Results: GPs rarely mentioned AR thresholds but were influenced by their subjective perception of the patient's risk and motivation, and their own attitudes toward prevention, including concerns about medication side effects and the efficacy of lifestyle change. Patients were influenced by individual risk factors, their own motivation to change lifestyle, and attitudes toward medication: initially negative, but this improved if medication was more effective than lifestyle. High perceived risk led to medication being recommended by GPs and accepted by patients, but this was not necessarily based on AR. Patient perceptions of high risk also increased motivation to change lifestyle, particularly if they were resistant to the idea of taking medication. Conclusions: Perceived risk, motivation, and attitudes appeared to be more important than AR thresholds in this study. CVD risk management guidelines could be more useful if they include strategies to help GPs consider patients' risk perception, motivation, and attitudes as well as evidence-based recommendations.",
author = "Carissa Bonner and Jesse Jansen and Shannon McKinn and Les Irwig and Jenny Doust and Paul Glasziou and Kirsten McCaffery",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1037/hea0000122",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "253--261",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

How do general practitioners and patients make decisions about cardiovascular disease risk? / Bonner, Carissa; Jansen, Jesse; McKinn, Shannon; Irwig, Les; Doust, Jenny; Glasziou, Paul; McCaffery, Kirsten.

In: Health Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2015, p. 253-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do general practitioners and patients make decisions about cardiovascular disease risk?

AU - Bonner, Carissa

AU - Jansen, Jesse

AU - McKinn, Shannon

AU - Irwig, Les

AU - Doust, Jenny

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: Although current guidelines around the world recommend using absolute risk (AR) thresholds to decide whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk should be managed with lifestyle or medication, the use of AR in clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence general practitioner (GP) and patient decision making about CVD risk management, including the role of risk perception. Methods: Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 25 GPs and 38 patients in Australia in 2011-2012. Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded and a Framework Analysis method was used. Results: GPs rarely mentioned AR thresholds but were influenced by their subjective perception of the patient's risk and motivation, and their own attitudes toward prevention, including concerns about medication side effects and the efficacy of lifestyle change. Patients were influenced by individual risk factors, their own motivation to change lifestyle, and attitudes toward medication: initially negative, but this improved if medication was more effective than lifestyle. High perceived risk led to medication being recommended by GPs and accepted by patients, but this was not necessarily based on AR. Patient perceptions of high risk also increased motivation to change lifestyle, particularly if they were resistant to the idea of taking medication. Conclusions: Perceived risk, motivation, and attitudes appeared to be more important than AR thresholds in this study. CVD risk management guidelines could be more useful if they include strategies to help GPs consider patients' risk perception, motivation, and attitudes as well as evidence-based recommendations.

AB - Objective: Although current guidelines around the world recommend using absolute risk (AR) thresholds to decide whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk should be managed with lifestyle or medication, the use of AR in clinical practice is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the factors that influence general practitioner (GP) and patient decision making about CVD risk management, including the role of risk perception. Methods: Qualitative descriptive study involving semi-structured interviews with 25 GPs and 38 patients in Australia in 2011-2012. Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded and a Framework Analysis method was used. Results: GPs rarely mentioned AR thresholds but were influenced by their subjective perception of the patient's risk and motivation, and their own attitudes toward prevention, including concerns about medication side effects and the efficacy of lifestyle change. Patients were influenced by individual risk factors, their own motivation to change lifestyle, and attitudes toward medication: initially negative, but this improved if medication was more effective than lifestyle. High perceived risk led to medication being recommended by GPs and accepted by patients, but this was not necessarily based on AR. Patient perceptions of high risk also increased motivation to change lifestyle, particularly if they were resistant to the idea of taking medication. Conclusions: Perceived risk, motivation, and attitudes appeared to be more important than AR thresholds in this study. CVD risk management guidelines could be more useful if they include strategies to help GPs consider patients' risk perception, motivation, and attitudes as well as evidence-based recommendations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906041590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/hea0000122

DO - 10.1037/hea0000122

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 253

EP - 261

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

IS - 3

ER -