How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences: A qualitative study

Brooke Nickel, Alexandra Barratt, Jolyn Hersch, Ray Moynihan, Les Irwig, Kirsten McCaffery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: There are increasing rates of mastectomy and bi-lateral mastectomy in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To help women avoid decisions that lead to unnecessary aggressive treatments, there have been recent calls to remove the cancer terminology from descriptions of DCIS. We investigated how different proposed terminologies for DCIS affect women's perceived concern and management preferences. Materials and methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a community sample of 26 Australian women varying by education and cancer screening experience. Women responded to a hypothetical scenario using terminology with and without the cancer term to describe DCIS. Results: Among a sample of women with no experience of a DCIS diagnosis, a hypothetical scenario involving a diagnosis of DCIS elicited high concern regardless of the terminology used to describe it. Women generally exhibited stronger negative reactions when a cancer term was used to describe DCIS compared to a non-cancer term, and most preferred the diagnosis be given as a description of abnormal cells. Overall women expressed interest in watchful waiting for DCIS but displayed preferences for very frequent monitoring with this management approach. Conclusion: Communicating a diagnosis of DCIS using terminology that does not include the cancer term was preferred by many women and may enable discussions about more conservative management options. However, women's preference for frequent monitoring during watchful waiting suggests women need more education and reassurance about this management approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-679
Number of pages7
JournalBreast
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Terminology
Watchful Waiting
Mastectomy
Neoplasms
Education
Early Detection of Cancer
Interviews

Cite this

Nickel, Brooke ; Barratt, Alexandra ; Hersch, Jolyn ; Moynihan, Ray ; Irwig, Les ; McCaffery, Kirsten. / How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences : A qualitative study. In: Breast. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 673-679.
@article{0c87c1e59f6d4dbf9f7bf0c2547f4e12,
title = "How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Objective: There are increasing rates of mastectomy and bi-lateral mastectomy in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To help women avoid decisions that lead to unnecessary aggressive treatments, there have been recent calls to remove the cancer terminology from descriptions of DCIS. We investigated how different proposed terminologies for DCIS affect women's perceived concern and management preferences. Materials and methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a community sample of 26 Australian women varying by education and cancer screening experience. Women responded to a hypothetical scenario using terminology with and without the cancer term to describe DCIS. Results: Among a sample of women with no experience of a DCIS diagnosis, a hypothetical scenario involving a diagnosis of DCIS elicited high concern regardless of the terminology used to describe it. Women generally exhibited stronger negative reactions when a cancer term was used to describe DCIS compared to a non-cancer term, and most preferred the diagnosis be given as a description of abnormal cells. Overall women expressed interest in watchful waiting for DCIS but displayed preferences for very frequent monitoring with this management approach. Conclusion: Communicating a diagnosis of DCIS using terminology that does not include the cancer term was preferred by many women and may enable discussions about more conservative management options. However, women's preference for frequent monitoring during watchful waiting suggests women need more education and reassurance about this management approach.",
author = "Brooke Nickel and Alexandra Barratt and Jolyn Hersch and Ray Moynihan and Les Irwig and Kirsten McCaffery",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.004",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "673--679",
journal = "Breast",
issn = "0960-9776",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences : A qualitative study. / Nickel, Brooke; Barratt, Alexandra; Hersch, Jolyn; Moynihan, Ray; Irwig, Les; McCaffery, Kirsten.

In: Breast, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2015, p. 673-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) impacts women's concern and management preferences

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Nickel, Brooke

AU - Barratt, Alexandra

AU - Hersch, Jolyn

AU - Moynihan, Ray

AU - Irwig, Les

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Objective: There are increasing rates of mastectomy and bi-lateral mastectomy in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To help women avoid decisions that lead to unnecessary aggressive treatments, there have been recent calls to remove the cancer terminology from descriptions of DCIS. We investigated how different proposed terminologies for DCIS affect women's perceived concern and management preferences. Materials and methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a community sample of 26 Australian women varying by education and cancer screening experience. Women responded to a hypothetical scenario using terminology with and without the cancer term to describe DCIS. Results: Among a sample of women with no experience of a DCIS diagnosis, a hypothetical scenario involving a diagnosis of DCIS elicited high concern regardless of the terminology used to describe it. Women generally exhibited stronger negative reactions when a cancer term was used to describe DCIS compared to a non-cancer term, and most preferred the diagnosis be given as a description of abnormal cells. Overall women expressed interest in watchful waiting for DCIS but displayed preferences for very frequent monitoring with this management approach. Conclusion: Communicating a diagnosis of DCIS using terminology that does not include the cancer term was preferred by many women and may enable discussions about more conservative management options. However, women's preference for frequent monitoring during watchful waiting suggests women need more education and reassurance about this management approach.

AB - Objective: There are increasing rates of mastectomy and bi-lateral mastectomy in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To help women avoid decisions that lead to unnecessary aggressive treatments, there have been recent calls to remove the cancer terminology from descriptions of DCIS. We investigated how different proposed terminologies for DCIS affect women's perceived concern and management preferences. Materials and methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a community sample of 26 Australian women varying by education and cancer screening experience. Women responded to a hypothetical scenario using terminology with and without the cancer term to describe DCIS. Results: Among a sample of women with no experience of a DCIS diagnosis, a hypothetical scenario involving a diagnosis of DCIS elicited high concern regardless of the terminology used to describe it. Women generally exhibited stronger negative reactions when a cancer term was used to describe DCIS compared to a non-cancer term, and most preferred the diagnosis be given as a description of abnormal cells. Overall women expressed interest in watchful waiting for DCIS but displayed preferences for very frequent monitoring with this management approach. Conclusion: Communicating a diagnosis of DCIS using terminology that does not include the cancer term was preferred by many women and may enable discussions about more conservative management options. However, women's preference for frequent monitoring during watchful waiting suggests women need more education and reassurance about this management approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952638922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.004

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 673

EP - 679

JO - Breast

JF - Breast

SN - 0960-9776

IS - 5

ER -