How APPropriate are physical activity apps for pregnant women: A systematic search and content analysis of evidence-based content, features of exercise instruction, and expert involvement

Melanie Hayman, Kristie-Lee Alfrey, Kim Waters, Summer Cannon, Gregore I Iven Mielke, Shelley Keating, Gabriela Mena, Michelle Mottola, Kelly Evenson, Margie Davenport, S. Ariel Barlow, Emily Budzynski-Seymour, Natalie Comardelle, Madison Dickey, Cheryce L. Harrison, Maryam Kebbe, Trine Moholdt, Lisa J. Moran, Taniya S. Nagpal, Stephanie SchoeppeWendy J Brown, Susan Williams, Lisa Vincze

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose:
Physical activity during pregnancy is associated with health benefits for both mother and child. Pregnant women are increasingly using mobile applications (apps) to access health-related information. However, the extent to which apps provide physical activity/exercise advice that aligns with current evidence-based pregnancy guidelines is unclear. The purpose of this study was to conduct the first systematic search and content analysis of apps that promote physical activity/exercise in pregnancy to examine the alignment of the content with current evidence-based physical activity guidelines, features and credentials of app
developers.

Methods:
Systematic searches were conducted in the Australian AppStore and GooglePlay stores in October 2020. Apps were identified using search terms relevant to pregnancy and physical activity/exercise and screened for inclusion (free to download or did not require immediate paid subscription and an average user rating of 4+ out of 5). Each app was independently reviewed using an author-designed extraction tool. Data were exported, collated, and reported using descriptive statistics.

Results:
Twenty-seven apps were included in this review (GooglePlay: n=16 and AppStore: n=11). Seventeen apps provided some information relating to each of the FITT principles (frequency, intensity, time, type) of exercise; however, only three provided this information in-line with current evidence-based physical activity guidelines. Ten apps provided information about contraindications to exercise during pregnancy and referenced the supporting evidence. No apps actively engaged in screening for potential contraindications. Only four apps collected information about the user’s current exercise behaviours, three apps allowed users to
personalise features relating to their exercise preferences, and ten apps provided information about developer credentials.

Conclusions:
Few physical activity/exercise apps designed for pregnancy aligned with current evidence-based physical activity guidelines. There is a need to improve the quality of apps that promote exercise in pregnancy, to ensure women are appropriately supported to engage in exercise, and the potential risk of injury, complications and/or adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mother and child is minimised. This could be done by providing expert guidance that aligns with current guidelines, introducing screening measures and features that enable personalisation and tailoring to individual users, or by developing a recognised system for
regulating apps.

Original languageEnglish
Pages144-144
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2022
EventInternational Society of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity annual meeting - Phoenix, United States
Duration: 18 May 202221 May 2022
https://isbnpa.org/annual-conference/

Conference

ConferenceInternational Society of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity annual meeting
Abbreviated titleISBNPA 2022
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPhoenix
Period18/05/2221/05/22
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How APPropriate are physical activity apps for pregnant women: A systematic search and content analysis of evidence-based content, features of exercise instruction, and expert involvement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this