Abstract
The regulation of registered health practitioners in Australia focuses upon "holding out" provisions rather than statutory "scope of practice" provisions. One concern for non-registrant complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and other non-registrants is whether these holding out provisions are breached by simply providing a modality which may also be applied by a registered health practitioner (such as the use of Chinese Massage) and when does a breach of the holding out occur when they use particular words that might in the context of when they are used may be deemed to constitute a holding out. This article will analyse the relevant provisions of the National Law and case law to determine some guidelines for practitioners to avoid liability.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1033-1041 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Law and Medicine |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 4 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2018 |