TY - JOUR
T1 - Historical Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Learning From the Past to Move to the Future
AU - Redfern, Julie
AU - Gallagher, Robyn
AU - O’Neil, Adrienne
AU - Grace, Sherry L.
AU - Bauman, Adrian
AU - Jennings, Garry
AU - Brieger, David
AU - Briffa, Tom
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Redfern, Gallagher, O’Neil, Grace, Bauman, Jennings, Brieger and Briffa.
PY - 2022/4/27
Y1 - 2022/4/27
N2 - Contemporary myocardial infarction (MI) care and management has evolved dramatically since the 1950’s; yet outpatient rehabilitation remains underutilized. Deepening our understanding of the origins and history of cardiac rehabilitation highlights a contemporary shift required for policy and practice related to secondary prevention of coronary disease in light of societal changes as well as medical, digital and surgical advancements. Contemporary “cardiac rehabilitation” began when bed rest and physical inactivity was recommended and commonplace for MI survivors. Today, most patients who survive an MI, undergo reperfusion therapy, a short inpatient stay and are discharged with minimal physical morbidity. Despite this, the majority of modern day programs continue to be structured in the same way they have been for the past 50 years and this model has become incongruent with the contemporary context, especially in the COVID-19 era. This review aims to describe the historical foundations of cardiac rehabilitation to inform solutions and meet the demands of contemporary MI management. Delivering health systems reform to address modernization is current healthcare challenge where a united and interdisciplinary effort is needed.
AB - Contemporary myocardial infarction (MI) care and management has evolved dramatically since the 1950’s; yet outpatient rehabilitation remains underutilized. Deepening our understanding of the origins and history of cardiac rehabilitation highlights a contemporary shift required for policy and practice related to secondary prevention of coronary disease in light of societal changes as well as medical, digital and surgical advancements. Contemporary “cardiac rehabilitation” began when bed rest and physical inactivity was recommended and commonplace for MI survivors. Today, most patients who survive an MI, undergo reperfusion therapy, a short inpatient stay and are discharged with minimal physical morbidity. Despite this, the majority of modern day programs continue to be structured in the same way they have been for the past 50 years and this model has become incongruent with the contemporary context, especially in the COVID-19 era. This review aims to describe the historical foundations of cardiac rehabilitation to inform solutions and meet the demands of contemporary MI management. Delivering health systems reform to address modernization is current healthcare challenge where a united and interdisciplinary effort is needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137370974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842567
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842567
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35571195
AN - SCOPUS:85137370974
VL - 9
SP - 1
EP - 8
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 842567
ER -