Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper: Effects on Neuromuscular Performance

Hayden J Pritchard, Matthew J Barnes, Robin J Stewart, Justin W Keogh, Michael R McGuigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
208 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of strength-training tapers of different intensities but equal volume reductions on neuromuscular performance.

METHODS: Eleven strength-trained men (21.3 [3.3] y, 92.3 [17.6] kg, relative 1-repetition-maximum deadlift 1.9 [0.2] times bodyweight) completed a crossover study. Specifically, two 4-wk strength-training blocks were followed by a taper week with reduced volume (∼70%) involving either increased (5.9%) or decreased (-8.5%) intensity. Testing occurred pretraining (T1), posttraining (T2), and posttaper (T3). Salivary testosterone and cortisol, plasma creatine kinase, a Daily Analysis of Life Demands in Athletes questionnaire, countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric midthigh pull, and isometric bench press were measured.

RESULTS: CMJ height improved significantly over time (P < .001), with significant increases from T1 (38.0 [5.5] cm) to both T2 (39.3 [5.3] cm; P = .010) and T3 (40.0 [5.3] cm; P = .001) and from T2 to T3 (P = .002). CMJ flight time:contraction time increased significantly over time (P = .004), with significant increases from T1 (0.747 [0.162]) to T2 (0.791 [0.163]; P = .012). Isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force improved significantly over time (P = .033), with significant increases from T1 (34.7 [5.0] N/kg) to T2 (35.9 [4.8] N/kg; P = .013). No significant changes were found between tapers. However, the higher-intensity taper produced small effect-size increases at T3 vs T1 for isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force, CMJ height, and flight time:contraction time, while the lower-intensity taper only produced small effect-size improvements at T3 vs T1 for CMJ height.

CONCLUSIONS: A strength-training taper with volume reductions had a positive effect on power, with a tendency for the higher-intensity taper to produce more favorable changes in strength and power.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-463
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Volume14
Issue number4
Early online date20 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper: Effects on Neuromuscular Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this