Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper

Effects on Neuromuscular Performance

Hayden J Pritchard, Matthew J Barnes, Robin J Stewart, Justin W Keogh, Michael R McGuigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
92 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of strength-training tapers of different intensities but equal volume reductions on neuromuscular performance.

METHODS: Eleven strength-trained men (21.3 [3.3] y, 92.3 [17.6] kg, relative 1-repetition-maximum deadlift 1.9 [0.2] times bodyweight) completed a crossover study. Specifically, two 4-wk strength-training blocks were followed by a taper week with reduced volume (∼70%) involving either increased (5.9%) or decreased (-8.5%) intensity. Testing occurred pretraining (T1), posttraining (T2), and posttaper (T3). Salivary testosterone and cortisol, plasma creatine kinase, a Daily Analysis of Life Demands in Athletes questionnaire, countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric midthigh pull, and isometric bench press were measured.

RESULTS: CMJ height improved significantly over time (P < .001), with significant increases from T1 (38.0 [5.5] cm) to both T2 (39.3 [5.3] cm; P = .010) and T3 (40.0 [5.3] cm; P = .001) and from T2 to T3 (P = .002). CMJ flight time:contraction time increased significantly over time (P = .004), with significant increases from T1 (0.747 [0.162]) to T2 (0.791 [0.163]; P = .012). Isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force improved significantly over time (P = .033), with significant increases from T1 (34.7 [5.0] N/kg) to T2 (35.9 [4.8] N/kg; P = .013). No significant changes were found between tapers. However, the higher-intensity taper produced small effect-size increases at T3 vs T1 for isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force, CMJ height, and flight time:contraction time, while the lower-intensity taper only produced small effect-size improvements at T3 vs T1 for CMJ height.

CONCLUSIONS: A strength-training taper with volume reductions had a positive effect on power, with a tendency for the higher-intensity taper to produce more favorable changes in strength and power.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-463
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Volume14
Issue number4
Early online date20 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Resistance Training
Creatine Kinase
Athletes
Cross-Over Studies
Hydrocortisone
Testosterone

Cite this

Pritchard, Hayden J ; Barnes, Matthew J ; Stewart, Robin J ; Keogh, Justin W ; McGuigan, Michael R. / Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper : Effects on Neuromuscular Performance. In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 458-463.
@article{8e7caeea5d0f41998710de3570e70ab4,
title = "Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper: Effects on Neuromuscular Performance",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of strength-training tapers of different intensities but equal volume reductions on neuromuscular performance.METHODS: Eleven strength-trained men (21.3 [3.3] y, 92.3 [17.6] kg, relative 1-repetition-maximum deadlift 1.9 [0.2] times bodyweight) completed a crossover study. Specifically, two 4-wk strength-training blocks were followed by a taper week with reduced volume (∼70{\%}) involving either increased (5.9{\%}) or decreased (-8.5{\%}) intensity. Testing occurred pretraining (T1), posttraining (T2), and posttaper (T3). Salivary testosterone and cortisol, plasma creatine kinase, a Daily Analysis of Life Demands in Athletes questionnaire, countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric midthigh pull, and isometric bench press were measured.RESULTS: CMJ height improved significantly over time (P < .001), with significant increases from T1 (38.0 [5.5] cm) to both T2 (39.3 [5.3] cm; P = .010) and T3 (40.0 [5.3] cm; P = .001) and from T2 to T3 (P = .002). CMJ flight time:contraction time increased significantly over time (P = .004), with significant increases from T1 (0.747 [0.162]) to T2 (0.791 [0.163]; P = .012). Isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force improved significantly over time (P = .033), with significant increases from T1 (34.7 [5.0] N/kg) to T2 (35.9 [4.8] N/kg; P = .013). No significant changes were found between tapers. However, the higher-intensity taper produced small effect-size increases at T3 vs T1 for isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force, CMJ height, and flight time:contraction time, while the lower-intensity taper only produced small effect-size improvements at T3 vs T1 for CMJ height.CONCLUSIONS: A strength-training taper with volume reductions had a positive effect on power, with a tendency for the higher-intensity taper to produce more favorable changes in strength and power.",
author = "Pritchard, {Hayden J} and Barnes, {Matthew J} and Stewart, {Robin J} and Keogh, {Justin W} and McGuigan, {Michael R}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1123/ijspp.2018-0489",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "458--463",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance",
issn = "1555-0265",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper : Effects on Neuromuscular Performance. / Pritchard, Hayden J; Barnes, Matthew J; Stewart, Robin J; Keogh, Justin W; McGuigan, Michael R.

In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Vol. 14, No. 4, 04.2019, p. 458-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Higher- Versus Lower-Intensity Strength-Training Taper

T2 - Effects on Neuromuscular Performance

AU - Pritchard, Hayden J

AU - Barnes, Matthew J

AU - Stewart, Robin J

AU - Keogh, Justin W

AU - McGuigan, Michael R

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of strength-training tapers of different intensities but equal volume reductions on neuromuscular performance.METHODS: Eleven strength-trained men (21.3 [3.3] y, 92.3 [17.6] kg, relative 1-repetition-maximum deadlift 1.9 [0.2] times bodyweight) completed a crossover study. Specifically, two 4-wk strength-training blocks were followed by a taper week with reduced volume (∼70%) involving either increased (5.9%) or decreased (-8.5%) intensity. Testing occurred pretraining (T1), posttraining (T2), and posttaper (T3). Salivary testosterone and cortisol, plasma creatine kinase, a Daily Analysis of Life Demands in Athletes questionnaire, countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric midthigh pull, and isometric bench press were measured.RESULTS: CMJ height improved significantly over time (P < .001), with significant increases from T1 (38.0 [5.5] cm) to both T2 (39.3 [5.3] cm; P = .010) and T3 (40.0 [5.3] cm; P = .001) and from T2 to T3 (P = .002). CMJ flight time:contraction time increased significantly over time (P = .004), with significant increases from T1 (0.747 [0.162]) to T2 (0.791 [0.163]; P = .012). Isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force improved significantly over time (P = .033), with significant increases from T1 (34.7 [5.0] N/kg) to T2 (35.9 [4.8] N/kg; P = .013). No significant changes were found between tapers. However, the higher-intensity taper produced small effect-size increases at T3 vs T1 for isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force, CMJ height, and flight time:contraction time, while the lower-intensity taper only produced small effect-size improvements at T3 vs T1 for CMJ height.CONCLUSIONS: A strength-training taper with volume reductions had a positive effect on power, with a tendency for the higher-intensity taper to produce more favorable changes in strength and power.

AB - PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of strength-training tapers of different intensities but equal volume reductions on neuromuscular performance.METHODS: Eleven strength-trained men (21.3 [3.3] y, 92.3 [17.6] kg, relative 1-repetition-maximum deadlift 1.9 [0.2] times bodyweight) completed a crossover study. Specifically, two 4-wk strength-training blocks were followed by a taper week with reduced volume (∼70%) involving either increased (5.9%) or decreased (-8.5%) intensity. Testing occurred pretraining (T1), posttraining (T2), and posttaper (T3). Salivary testosterone and cortisol, plasma creatine kinase, a Daily Analysis of Life Demands in Athletes questionnaire, countermovement jump (CMJ), isometric midthigh pull, and isometric bench press were measured.RESULTS: CMJ height improved significantly over time (P < .001), with significant increases from T1 (38.0 [5.5] cm) to both T2 (39.3 [5.3] cm; P = .010) and T3 (40.0 [5.3] cm; P = .001) and from T2 to T3 (P = .002). CMJ flight time:contraction time increased significantly over time (P = .004), with significant increases from T1 (0.747 [0.162]) to T2 (0.791 [0.163]; P = .012). Isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force improved significantly over time (P = .033), with significant increases from T1 (34.7 [5.0] N/kg) to T2 (35.9 [4.8] N/kg; P = .013). No significant changes were found between tapers. However, the higher-intensity taper produced small effect-size increases at T3 vs T1 for isometric midthigh-pull relative peak force, CMJ height, and flight time:contraction time, while the lower-intensity taper only produced small effect-size improvements at T3 vs T1 for CMJ height.CONCLUSIONS: A strength-training taper with volume reductions had a positive effect on power, with a tendency for the higher-intensity taper to produce more favorable changes in strength and power.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063276447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0489

DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0489

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 458

EP - 463

JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

SN - 1555-0265

IS - 4

ER -