Hearing the voices of Victorian conferencing practitioners – views on neutrality

Kathy Douglas, Nadia Sager, Rachael M Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review


Conferencing is a restorative justice process that is used in the criminal justice system in Australia to deal with a variety of offences. In this article, the authors analyse research into the understandings of conferencing practitioners regarding the issue of the neutrality of the third party in facilitating the process. The research was conducted using a qualitative methodology with a small group of practitioners in Victoria. In the semi-structured interviews the practitioners described and discussed their understandings of the concept of neutrality in conferencing and their thoughts regarding practice issues. The analysis of the study results indicates a need for further research in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-170
Number of pages8
JournalAustralasian Dispute Resolution Journal
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Hearing the voices of Victorian conferencing practitioners – views on neutrality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this