Hearing the voices of Victorian conferencing practitioners – views on neutrality

Kathy Douglas, Nadia Sager, Rachael M Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Conferencing is a restorative justice process that is used in the criminal justice system in Australia to deal with a variety of offences. In this article, the authors analyse research into the understandings of conferencing practitioners regarding the issue of the neutrality of the third party in facilitating the process. The research was conducted using a qualitative methodology with a small group of practitioners in Victoria. In the semi-structured interviews the practitioners described and discussed their understandings of the concept of neutrality in conferencing and their thoughts regarding practice issues. The analysis of the study results indicates a need for further research in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-170
Number of pages8
JournalAustralasian Dispute Resolution Journal
Volume21
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

neutrality
justice
small group
offense
methodology
interview

Cite this

@article{dbe0215698c7439ebef99d2391f61260,
title = "Hearing the voices of Victorian conferencing practitioners – views on neutrality",
abstract = "Conferencing is a restorative justice process that is used in the criminal justice system in Australia to deal with a variety of offences. In this article, the authors analyse research into the understandings of conferencing practitioners regarding the issue of the neutrality of the third party in facilitating the process. The research was conducted using a qualitative methodology with a small group of practitioners in Victoria. In the semi-structured interviews the practitioners described and discussed their understandings of the concept of neutrality in conferencing and their thoughts regarding practice issues. The analysis of the study results indicates a need for further research in this area.",
author = "Kathy Douglas and Nadia Sager and Field, {Rachael M}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "163--170",
journal = "Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal",
issn = "1441-7847",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "3",

}

Hearing the voices of Victorian conferencing practitioners – views on neutrality. / Douglas, Kathy; Sager, Nadia; Field, Rachael M.

In: Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2010, p. 163-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hearing the voices of Victorian conferencing practitioners – views on neutrality

AU - Douglas, Kathy

AU - Sager, Nadia

AU - Field, Rachael M

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Conferencing is a restorative justice process that is used in the criminal justice system in Australia to deal with a variety of offences. In this article, the authors analyse research into the understandings of conferencing practitioners regarding the issue of the neutrality of the third party in facilitating the process. The research was conducted using a qualitative methodology with a small group of practitioners in Victoria. In the semi-structured interviews the practitioners described and discussed their understandings of the concept of neutrality in conferencing and their thoughts regarding practice issues. The analysis of the study results indicates a need for further research in this area.

AB - Conferencing is a restorative justice process that is used in the criminal justice system in Australia to deal with a variety of offences. In this article, the authors analyse research into the understandings of conferencing practitioners regarding the issue of the neutrality of the third party in facilitating the process. The research was conducted using a qualitative methodology with a small group of practitioners in Victoria. In the semi-structured interviews the practitioners described and discussed their understandings of the concept of neutrality in conferencing and their thoughts regarding practice issues. The analysis of the study results indicates a need for further research in this area.

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 163

EP - 170

JO - Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal

JF - Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal

SN - 1441-7847

IS - 3

ER -