Health care reform in the United States: An opportunity for primary care?

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveyResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary
Some aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.
Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include:
health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred care
trials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of services
an integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficiencies
physician engagement in reforms — for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service.
Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include:
increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative waste
an overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health care
a focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume192
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Care Reform
Primary Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
State Government
Fee-for-Service Plans
Federal Government
Continuity of Patient Care
Frustration
Quality of Health Care
Health Services Research
Health
Health Expenditures
Insurance
New Zealand
Health Services

Cite this

@article{f89539f5228547798b96c1356c3312d5,
title = "Health care reform in the United States: An opportunity for primary care?",
abstract = "SummarySome aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include:health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred caretrials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of servicesan integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficienciesphysician engagement in reforms — for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service.Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include:increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative wastean overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health carea focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.",
author = "Zwar, {Nicholas A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "192",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD",
number = "1",

}

Health care reform in the United States : An opportunity for primary care? / Zwar, Nicholas A.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 192, No. 1, 04.01.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveyResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health care reform in the United States

T2 - An opportunity for primary care?

AU - Zwar, Nicholas A.

PY - 2010/1/4

Y1 - 2010/1/4

N2 - SummarySome aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include:health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred caretrials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of servicesan integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficienciesphysician engagement in reforms — for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service.Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include:increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative wastean overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health carea focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.

AB - SummarySome aspects of health care in the United States would be beneficial to Australia and New Zealand, but others should be avoided.Positive aspects, which should be emulated, include:health care reform that is focused on the continuum of care and patient-centred caretrials of new models to organise, deliver and pay for health care services, where quality of care is rewarded over quantity of servicesan integral view of, and strong support for, health services research as a means of evaluating reforms aimed at improving patient outcomes and systems-level efficienciesphysician engagement in reforms — for example, participating in the Choosing Wisely initiative, and trialling and implementing new payment models that are not fee-for-service.Negative aspects, which should be avoided, include:increasingly fragmented provider and financing structures (funding provided by state and federal governments, private insurance and out-of-pocket costs) that cause frustration in terms of access and care coordination and increase administrative wastean overemphasis on technological solutions, with insufficient acknowledgment of the importance of addressing value in health carea focus on hospital and doctor-based health care rather than environmental and social inputs into health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77449154327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Short survey

VL - 192

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 1

ER -