Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality

Gregory J. Boyle, Lazar Stankov, Nicholas G. Martin, K. V. Petrides, Michael W. Eysenck, Generos Ortet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
65 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The two most prominent individual differences researchers of the twentieth century were Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell. Both were giants of scientific psychology, each publishing scores of books and hundreds of empirical peer-reviewed journal articles. Influenced by Hebb's distinction between physiological (Intelligence A) and experiential (Intelligence B), Eysenck focused on discovering the underlying biological substrata of intelligence. Analogously, Cattell proposed the Gf–Gc theory which distinguishes between fluid and crystallised intelligence. Cattell's Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT), a measure primarily of fluid intelligence, was constructed specifically to minimise differences in test bias in IQ scores between different ethnic/racial groups. Within the personality realm, Eysenck adopted a pragmatic three-factor model as measured via the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-R) and its variants. In contrast, Cattell employed a lexical approach that resulted in a large number of primary and secondary normal and abnormal personality trait dimensions, measured via the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), and the corresponding Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ), respectively. Recent molecular genetics findings provide empirical confirmation of Eysenck and Cattell's positions on the biological underpinnings of personality and ability traits, allowing an improved understanding of the causes of individual differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-47
Number of pages8
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume103
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Intelligence
Personality
Individuality
Intelligence Tests
Aptitude
Ethnic Groups
Molecular Biology
Research Personnel
Psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Boyle, G. J., Stankov, L., Martin, N. G., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, M. W., & Ortet, G. (2016). Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029
Boyle, Gregory J. ; Stankov, Lazar ; Martin, Nicholas G. ; Petrides, K. V. ; Eysenck, Michael W. ; Ortet, Generos. / Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2016 ; Vol. 103. pp. 40-47.
@article{604a7c66fc394913a30058c1f7875da4,
title = "Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality",
abstract = "The two most prominent individual differences researchers of the twentieth century were Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell. Both were giants of scientific psychology, each publishing scores of books and hundreds of empirical peer-reviewed journal articles. Influenced by Hebb's distinction between physiological (Intelligence A) and experiential (Intelligence B), Eysenck focused on discovering the underlying biological substrata of intelligence. Analogously, Cattell proposed the Gf–Gc theory which distinguishes between fluid and crystallised intelligence. Cattell's Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT), a measure primarily of fluid intelligence, was constructed specifically to minimise differences in test bias in IQ scores between different ethnic/racial groups. Within the personality realm, Eysenck adopted a pragmatic three-factor model as measured via the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-R) and its variants. In contrast, Cattell employed a lexical approach that resulted in a large number of primary and secondary normal and abnormal personality trait dimensions, measured via the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), and the corresponding Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ), respectively. Recent molecular genetics findings provide empirical confirmation of Eysenck and Cattell's positions on the biological underpinnings of personality and ability traits, allowing an improved understanding of the causes of individual differences.",
author = "Boyle, {Gregory J.} and Lazar Stankov and Martin, {Nicholas G.} and Petrides, {K. V.} and Eysenck, {Michael W.} and Generos Ortet",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "40--47",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Boyle, GJ, Stankov, L, Martin, NG, Petrides, KV, Eysenck, MW & Ortet, G 2016, 'Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality' Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 103, pp. 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029

Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality. / Boyle, Gregory J.; Stankov, Lazar; Martin, Nicholas G.; Petrides, K. V.; Eysenck, Michael W.; Ortet, Generos.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 103, 01.12.2016, p. 40-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality

AU - Boyle, Gregory J.

AU - Stankov, Lazar

AU - Martin, Nicholas G.

AU - Petrides, K. V.

AU - Eysenck, Michael W.

AU - Ortet, Generos

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - The two most prominent individual differences researchers of the twentieth century were Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell. Both were giants of scientific psychology, each publishing scores of books and hundreds of empirical peer-reviewed journal articles. Influenced by Hebb's distinction between physiological (Intelligence A) and experiential (Intelligence B), Eysenck focused on discovering the underlying biological substrata of intelligence. Analogously, Cattell proposed the Gf–Gc theory which distinguishes between fluid and crystallised intelligence. Cattell's Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT), a measure primarily of fluid intelligence, was constructed specifically to minimise differences in test bias in IQ scores between different ethnic/racial groups. Within the personality realm, Eysenck adopted a pragmatic three-factor model as measured via the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-R) and its variants. In contrast, Cattell employed a lexical approach that resulted in a large number of primary and secondary normal and abnormal personality trait dimensions, measured via the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), and the corresponding Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ), respectively. Recent molecular genetics findings provide empirical confirmation of Eysenck and Cattell's positions on the biological underpinnings of personality and ability traits, allowing an improved understanding of the causes of individual differences.

AB - The two most prominent individual differences researchers of the twentieth century were Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell. Both were giants of scientific psychology, each publishing scores of books and hundreds of empirical peer-reviewed journal articles. Influenced by Hebb's distinction between physiological (Intelligence A) and experiential (Intelligence B), Eysenck focused on discovering the underlying biological substrata of intelligence. Analogously, Cattell proposed the Gf–Gc theory which distinguishes between fluid and crystallised intelligence. Cattell's Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT), a measure primarily of fluid intelligence, was constructed specifically to minimise differences in test bias in IQ scores between different ethnic/racial groups. Within the personality realm, Eysenck adopted a pragmatic three-factor model as measured via the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-R) and its variants. In contrast, Cattell employed a lexical approach that resulted in a large number of primary and secondary normal and abnormal personality trait dimensions, measured via the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), and the corresponding Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ), respectively. Recent molecular genetics findings provide empirical confirmation of Eysenck and Cattell's positions on the biological underpinnings of personality and ability traits, allowing an improved understanding of the causes of individual differences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989888374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 40

EP - 47

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

ER -