Guarding our identities: The dilemma of transformation in the legal academy

Kathrine Galloway, Peter Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Sufficient evidence now exists to justify profound changes to the way in which the academy teaches the LLB. Such changes would involve a shift from the adversarial individualistic doctrinal focus of the traditional law degree, to embracing appropriate dispute resolution, students’ emotional intelligence and resilience, and the ‘soft’ skills called for in the ‘real’ world of work. This broad project, supported by the profession and called for by students and employers, is gaining traction with a growing body of research providing exemplars of strategies to enhance and actively evolve the curriculum to address concerning levels of psychological distress amongst law student (and lawyers). Transformation of students, and therefore lawyers, through an engaged and engaging curriculum is one thing – but where do legal academics stand on this contemporary shift in focus? This paper reflects on the genesis and the possible role of the academic lawyer’s identity in contributing to, or supporting, the culture of the law more broadly. It poses the question: to what extent is the (academic) lawyer-identity itself a precondition for systematic and sustainable change in the law, and lawyering? If it is, how ready is the academy to embrace the array of strategies to engender the transformation needed?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalQueensland University of Technology Law Review
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lawyer
academy
Law
student
working-day world
curriculum
emotional intelligence
resilience
employer
profession
evidence

Cite this

@article{be0adb8e9144427faf7b54cdeb0475ba,
title = "Guarding our identities: The dilemma of transformation in the legal academy",
abstract = "Sufficient evidence now exists to justify profound changes to the way in which the academy teaches the LLB. Such changes would involve a shift from the adversarial individualistic doctrinal focus of the traditional law degree, to embracing appropriate dispute resolution, students’ emotional intelligence and resilience, and the ‘soft’ skills called for in the ‘real’ world of work. This broad project, supported by the profession and called for by students and employers, is gaining traction with a growing body of research providing exemplars of strategies to enhance and actively evolve the curriculum to address concerning levels of psychological distress amongst law student (and lawyers). Transformation of students, and therefore lawyers, through an engaged and engaging curriculum is one thing – but where do legal academics stand on this contemporary shift in focus? This paper reflects on the genesis and the possible role of the academic lawyer’s identity in contributing to, or supporting, the culture of the law more broadly. It poses the question: to what extent is the (academic) lawyer-identity itself a precondition for systematic and sustainable change in the law, and lawyering? If it is, how ready is the academy to embrace the array of strategies to engender the transformation needed?",
author = "Kathrine Galloway and Peter Jones",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5204/qutlr.v14i1.512",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1--12",
journal = "Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal",
issn = "2201-7275",
publisher = "Queensland University of Technology, Faculty of Law",
number = "1",

}

Guarding our identities : The dilemma of transformation in the legal academy. / Galloway, Kathrine; Jones, Peter.

In: Queensland University of Technology Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2014, p. 1-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guarding our identities

T2 - The dilemma of transformation in the legal academy

AU - Galloway, Kathrine

AU - Jones, Peter

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Sufficient evidence now exists to justify profound changes to the way in which the academy teaches the LLB. Such changes would involve a shift from the adversarial individualistic doctrinal focus of the traditional law degree, to embracing appropriate dispute resolution, students’ emotional intelligence and resilience, and the ‘soft’ skills called for in the ‘real’ world of work. This broad project, supported by the profession and called for by students and employers, is gaining traction with a growing body of research providing exemplars of strategies to enhance and actively evolve the curriculum to address concerning levels of psychological distress amongst law student (and lawyers). Transformation of students, and therefore lawyers, through an engaged and engaging curriculum is one thing – but where do legal academics stand on this contemporary shift in focus? This paper reflects on the genesis and the possible role of the academic lawyer’s identity in contributing to, or supporting, the culture of the law more broadly. It poses the question: to what extent is the (academic) lawyer-identity itself a precondition for systematic and sustainable change in the law, and lawyering? If it is, how ready is the academy to embrace the array of strategies to engender the transformation needed?

AB - Sufficient evidence now exists to justify profound changes to the way in which the academy teaches the LLB. Such changes would involve a shift from the adversarial individualistic doctrinal focus of the traditional law degree, to embracing appropriate dispute resolution, students’ emotional intelligence and resilience, and the ‘soft’ skills called for in the ‘real’ world of work. This broad project, supported by the profession and called for by students and employers, is gaining traction with a growing body of research providing exemplars of strategies to enhance and actively evolve the curriculum to address concerning levels of psychological distress amongst law student (and lawyers). Transformation of students, and therefore lawyers, through an engaged and engaging curriculum is one thing – but where do legal academics stand on this contemporary shift in focus? This paper reflects on the genesis and the possible role of the academic lawyer’s identity in contributing to, or supporting, the culture of the law more broadly. It poses the question: to what extent is the (academic) lawyer-identity itself a precondition for systematic and sustainable change in the law, and lawyering? If it is, how ready is the academy to embrace the array of strategies to engender the transformation needed?

U2 - 10.5204/qutlr.v14i1.512

DO - 10.5204/qutlr.v14i1.512

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1

EP - 12

JO - Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal

JF - Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal

SN - 2201-7275

IS - 1

ER -