One distinctive feature of the increasing mediatisation of politics in general and election campaigns in particular is the growth of the media’s self-referential reflections on the interplay between politics and media. This meta-coverage has become a familiar media ritual that is not only evident in traditional ‘hard news’ media, but has also become an essential part of comedy and lifestyle programs. While some scholars argue that these self-referential revelations about how political communication and audiences are being conceptualised serves the public interest, others suggest that meta-coverage leads to increased cynicism and disengagement among citizens. In this context, the highly successful Australian television program Gruen Nation is a particularly instructive example. On the program, advertisers and campaign strategists engaged in meta-coverage of the 2010 Australian Federal Election campaign. This article examines how the program’s communication experts decoded political communication, how they performed their professional ideology and to what extent their meta-coverage contributed to a critical analysis of the interplay between media and the democratic process.
|Number of pages||17|
|Publication status||Published - Sep 2011|
|Event||Media, Communication and Democracy: Global and National Environments - RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia|
Duration: 1 Sep 2011 → 2 Sep 2011
|Conference||Media, Communication and Democracy|
|Period||1/09/11 → 2/09/11|