Grading Szpunar’s Opinion in Case C-18/18 – A Caution Against Worldwide Content Blocking As Default

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On 4th of June 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in Case C-18/18 between Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek (an Austrian politician) and Facebook Ireland Limited. The politician had sought to have certain current and future content – argued to be defamatory – blocked by Facebook with worldwide effect. This is arguably the most important Internet speech-related case currently before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and will doubtlessly influence court reasoning far beyond Europe.

This Comment analyses AG Szpunar’s interesting, but problematic, Opinion with particular emphasis on his reasoning in relation to the question of scope of jurisdiction; that is, what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders in these circumstances, rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)389-400
Number of pages12
JournalMasaryk University Journal of Law and Technology
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

grading
jurisdiction
facebook
Internet
politician
court of justice
Ireland
European Union

Cite this

@article{f9de4a14ae2a4c37814007de5d7b1286,
title = "Grading Szpunar’s Opinion in Case C-18/18 – A Caution Against Worldwide Content Blocking As Default",
abstract = "On 4th of June 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in Case C-18/18 between Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek (an Austrian politician) and Facebook Ireland Limited. The politician had sought to have certain current and future content – argued to be defamatory – blocked by Facebook with worldwide effect. This is arguably the most important Internet speech-related case currently before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and will doubtlessly influence court reasoning far beyond Europe.This Comment analyses AG Szpunar’s interesting, but problematic, Opinion with particular emphasis on his reasoning in relation to the question of scope of jurisdiction; that is, what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders in these circumstances, rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction.",
author = "Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
note = "License Agreement: Further use of Work (https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/about/editorialPolicies#custom-4) You hereby agree that You shall further use the Work after its publication in MUJLT as follows: c) publisher’s version (i.e. post-print with final typesetting, formatting and corrections) for non-commercial purposes (i.e. not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation): -on non-commercial academic repositories, provided that: i) it is not modified or adapted in any way, ii) third parties are not granted any rights to use the publisher’s version, iii) the reputation of MU and/or MUJLT is not negatively affected by such use;",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "389--400",
journal = "Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology",
issn = "1802-5943",
publisher = "Faculty of Law, Masaryk University",
number = "2",

}

Grading Szpunar’s Opinion in Case C-18/18 – A Caution Against Worldwide Content Blocking As Default. / Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2019, p. 389-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Grading Szpunar’s Opinion in Case C-18/18 – A Caution Against Worldwide Content Blocking As Default

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

N1 - License Agreement: Further use of Work (https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/about/editorialPolicies#custom-4) You hereby agree that You shall further use the Work after its publication in MUJLT as follows: c) publisher’s version (i.e. post-print with final typesetting, formatting and corrections) for non-commercial purposes (i.e. not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation): -on non-commercial academic repositories, provided that: i) it is not modified or adapted in any way, ii) third parties are not granted any rights to use the publisher’s version, iii) the reputation of MU and/or MUJLT is not negatively affected by such use;

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - On 4th of June 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in Case C-18/18 between Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek (an Austrian politician) and Facebook Ireland Limited. The politician had sought to have certain current and future content – argued to be defamatory – blocked by Facebook with worldwide effect. This is arguably the most important Internet speech-related case currently before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and will doubtlessly influence court reasoning far beyond Europe.This Comment analyses AG Szpunar’s interesting, but problematic, Opinion with particular emphasis on his reasoning in relation to the question of scope of jurisdiction; that is, what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders in these circumstances, rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction.

AB - On 4th of June 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in Case C-18/18 between Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek (an Austrian politician) and Facebook Ireland Limited. The politician had sought to have certain current and future content – argued to be defamatory – blocked by Facebook with worldwide effect. This is arguably the most important Internet speech-related case currently before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and will doubtlessly influence court reasoning far beyond Europe.This Comment analyses AG Szpunar’s interesting, but problematic, Opinion with particular emphasis on his reasoning in relation to the question of scope of jurisdiction; that is, what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders in these circumstances, rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction.

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 389

EP - 400

JO - Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology

JF - Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology

SN - 1802-5943

IS - 2

ER -