TY - JOUR
T1 - GRADE guidelines
T2 - 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
AU - Guyatt, Gordon
AU - Oxman, Andrew D.
AU - Sultan, Shahnaz
AU - Brozek, Jan
AU - Glasziou, Paul
AU - Alonso-Coello, Pablo
AU - Atkins, David
AU - Kunz, Regina
AU - Montori, Victor
AU - Jaeschke, Roman
AU - Rind, David
AU - Dahm, Philipp
AU - Akl, Elie A.
AU - Meerpohl, Joerg
AU - Vist, Gunn
AU - Berliner, Elise
AU - Norris, Susan
AU - Falck-Ytter, Yngve
AU - Schünemann, Holger J.
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence - high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.
AB - GRADE requires guideline developers to make an overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect (quality of evidence - high, moderate, low, or very low) for each important or critical outcome. GRADE suggests, for each outcome, the initial separate consideration of five domains of reasons for rating down the confidence in effect estimates, thereby allowing systematic review authors and guideline developers to arrive at an outcome-specific rating of confidence. Although this rating system represents discrete steps on an ordinal scale, it is helpful to view confidence in estimates as a continuum, and the final rating of confidence may differ from that suggested by separate consideration of each domain. An overall rating of confidence in estimates of effect is only relevant in settings when recommendations are being made. In general, it is based on the critical outcome that provides the lowest confidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871262970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 22542023
AN - SCOPUS:84871262970
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 66
SP - 151
EP - 157
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
IS - 2
ER -