Government involvement in high performance sport: An Australian national sporting organisation perspective

Lisa Gowthorp, Kristine Toohey, James Skinner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) and Summer Olympic National Sporting Organisations (NSOs) to determine the effect the relationship has on Olympic performance outcomes. Five Olympic NSOs were examined: Athletics Australia, Cycling Australia, Rowing Australia, Swimming Australia and Yachting Australia. All five NSOs represent sports in which Australia has consistently achieved strong results at previous Olympic Games. These NSOs receive significant funding from the ASC and, as such, are expected to achieve success at the Olympic Games. The ASC–NSO relationship was examined through an agency theory framework whereby the ‘contracts’ between the ASC (principal) and the NSOs (agents) were investigated through a survey, interviews and document analysis to identify potential management issues that may affect Olympic performance outcomes, such as agent or principal opportunism. The findings identified a lack of a collaborative high performance sport system in Australia, with the findings emphasising concerns over the ASC’s management of NSO programmes. While the ASC staff identified their organisation as the leader of high performance sport in Australia, the study’s NSO participants did not believe that the ASC had the capacity, capability and knowledge to fulfil this role.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-171
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
Volume9
Issue number1
Early online date17 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

sport
Olympic Games
Sports
performance
opportunism
High performance
Government
document analysis
management
funding
leader
staff
Olympics
lack
summer
interview

Cite this

@article{ac01f604ae534bffa6120adaa22164dc,
title = "Government involvement in high performance sport: An Australian national sporting organisation perspective",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) and Summer Olympic National Sporting Organisations (NSOs) to determine the effect the relationship has on Olympic performance outcomes. Five Olympic NSOs were examined: Athletics Australia, Cycling Australia, Rowing Australia, Swimming Australia and Yachting Australia. All five NSOs represent sports in which Australia has consistently achieved strong results at previous Olympic Games. These NSOs receive significant funding from the ASC and, as such, are expected to achieve success at the Olympic Games. The ASC–NSO relationship was examined through an agency theory framework whereby the ‘contracts’ between the ASC (principal) and the NSOs (agents) were investigated through a survey, interviews and document analysis to identify potential management issues that may affect Olympic performance outcomes, such as agent or principal opportunism. The findings identified a lack of a collaborative high performance sport system in Australia, with the findings emphasising concerns over the ASC’s management of NSO programmes. While the ASC staff identified their organisation as the leader of high performance sport in Australia, the study’s NSO participants did not believe that the ASC had the capacity, capability and knowledge to fulfil this role.",
author = "Lisa Gowthorp and Kristine Toohey and James Skinner",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/19406940.2016.1220404",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "153--171",
journal = "International Journal of Sport Policy",
issn = "1940-6940",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Government involvement in high performance sport: An Australian national sporting organisation perspective. / Gowthorp, Lisa; Toohey, Kristine; Skinner, James.

In: International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 153-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Government involvement in high performance sport: An Australian national sporting organisation perspective

AU - Gowthorp, Lisa

AU - Toohey, Kristine

AU - Skinner, James

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) and Summer Olympic National Sporting Organisations (NSOs) to determine the effect the relationship has on Olympic performance outcomes. Five Olympic NSOs were examined: Athletics Australia, Cycling Australia, Rowing Australia, Swimming Australia and Yachting Australia. All five NSOs represent sports in which Australia has consistently achieved strong results at previous Olympic Games. These NSOs receive significant funding from the ASC and, as such, are expected to achieve success at the Olympic Games. The ASC–NSO relationship was examined through an agency theory framework whereby the ‘contracts’ between the ASC (principal) and the NSOs (agents) were investigated through a survey, interviews and document analysis to identify potential management issues that may affect Olympic performance outcomes, such as agent or principal opportunism. The findings identified a lack of a collaborative high performance sport system in Australia, with the findings emphasising concerns over the ASC’s management of NSO programmes. While the ASC staff identified their organisation as the leader of high performance sport in Australia, the study’s NSO participants did not believe that the ASC had the capacity, capability and knowledge to fulfil this role.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the Australian Sports Commission (ASC) and Summer Olympic National Sporting Organisations (NSOs) to determine the effect the relationship has on Olympic performance outcomes. Five Olympic NSOs were examined: Athletics Australia, Cycling Australia, Rowing Australia, Swimming Australia and Yachting Australia. All five NSOs represent sports in which Australia has consistently achieved strong results at previous Olympic Games. These NSOs receive significant funding from the ASC and, as such, are expected to achieve success at the Olympic Games. The ASC–NSO relationship was examined through an agency theory framework whereby the ‘contracts’ between the ASC (principal) and the NSOs (agents) were investigated through a survey, interviews and document analysis to identify potential management issues that may affect Olympic performance outcomes, such as agent or principal opportunism. The findings identified a lack of a collaborative high performance sport system in Australia, with the findings emphasising concerns over the ASC’s management of NSO programmes. While the ASC staff identified their organisation as the leader of high performance sport in Australia, the study’s NSO participants did not believe that the ASC had the capacity, capability and knowledge to fulfil this role.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982279608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19406940.2016.1220404

DO - 10.1080/19406940.2016.1220404

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 153

EP - 171

JO - International Journal of Sport Policy

JF - International Journal of Sport Policy

SN - 1940-6940

IS - 1

ER -