Abstract
The use of grant contracts to deliver community services is now a significant feature of all Australian government administrations. These contracts are the primary instrument governing the provision of such services to citizens and are largely outside the usual parliamentary review mechanisms and constraints. This article examines the extent of the erosion of fundamental constitutional principles facilitated by the use of private contracts, by applying the principles used in scrutiny of delegated legislation to standard form federal and State community service contracts. It reveals extensive executive power which, if the relationship were founded in legislative instruments rather than in private contract, would have to be justified to Parliament at least and possibly not tolerated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-297 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Public Law Review |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Government community service contracts: restraining abuse of power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver