Governance, democracy and development

Yashar Tarverdi, Shrabani Saha, Neil Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

While it is obvious that the level of democracy will affect the quality of governance, we show that an electoral democracy should not be expected to have an improved level of governance when compared with an outright authoritarian regime. We use the term ‘electoral democracy’ to refer to where relatively free and fair elections are held (where opposition parties stand some chance of winning government) but the institutions of a liberal society (like freedom of the press) are not in place. Given this, we consider what level of democracy is necessary before we can expect it to have a positive effect upon governance. We employ a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct a new governance indicator. Using the data from over one hundred countries and advanced panel data analysis for the period 1996–2012, our results confirm that political freedom and civil rights influence the level of governance, but this effect is found to be nonlinear. Governance is typically higher in dictatorships than in countries that are partially democratised (electoral democracies). However, once past a threshold, democratic practices assist good governance. Furthermore, it is found that democracy substantially strengthens levels of governance only within the top-half of the conditional distribution.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)220-233
Number of pages14
JournalEconomic Analysis and Policy
Volume63
Early online date1 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Democracy
Governance
Political freedom
Dictatorship
Civil rights
Government
Elections
Conditional distribution
Principal component analysis
Panel data analysis

Cite this

Tarverdi, Yashar ; Saha, Shrabani ; Campbell, Neil. / Governance, democracy and development. In: Economic Analysis and Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 63. pp. 220-233.
@article{29b583cc67d9454db47ad0e41a0d3c64,
title = "Governance, democracy and development",
abstract = "While it is obvious that the level of democracy will affect the quality of governance, we show that an electoral democracy should not be expected to have an improved level of governance when compared with an outright authoritarian regime. We use the term ‘electoral democracy’ to refer to where relatively free and fair elections are held (where opposition parties stand some chance of winning government) but the institutions of a liberal society (like freedom of the press) are not in place. Given this, we consider what level of democracy is necessary before we can expect it to have a positive effect upon governance. We employ a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct a new governance indicator. Using the data from over one hundred countries and advanced panel data analysis for the period 1996–2012, our results confirm that political freedom and civil rights influence the level of governance, but this effect is found to be nonlinear. Governance is typically higher in dictatorships than in countries that are partially democratised (electoral democracies). However, once past a threshold, democratic practices assist good governance. Furthermore, it is found that democracy substantially strengthens levels of governance only within the top-half of the conditional distribution.",
author = "Yashar Tarverdi and Shrabani Saha and Neil Campbell",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eap.2019.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "220--233",
journal = "Economic Analysis and Policy",
issn = "0313-5926",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Governance, democracy and development. / Tarverdi, Yashar; Saha, Shrabani; Campbell, Neil.

In: Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 63, 01.09.2019, p. 220-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance, democracy and development

AU - Tarverdi, Yashar

AU - Saha, Shrabani

AU - Campbell, Neil

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - While it is obvious that the level of democracy will affect the quality of governance, we show that an electoral democracy should not be expected to have an improved level of governance when compared with an outright authoritarian regime. We use the term ‘electoral democracy’ to refer to where relatively free and fair elections are held (where opposition parties stand some chance of winning government) but the institutions of a liberal society (like freedom of the press) are not in place. Given this, we consider what level of democracy is necessary before we can expect it to have a positive effect upon governance. We employ a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct a new governance indicator. Using the data from over one hundred countries and advanced panel data analysis for the period 1996–2012, our results confirm that political freedom and civil rights influence the level of governance, but this effect is found to be nonlinear. Governance is typically higher in dictatorships than in countries that are partially democratised (electoral democracies). However, once past a threshold, democratic practices assist good governance. Furthermore, it is found that democracy substantially strengthens levels of governance only within the top-half of the conditional distribution.

AB - While it is obvious that the level of democracy will affect the quality of governance, we show that an electoral democracy should not be expected to have an improved level of governance when compared with an outright authoritarian regime. We use the term ‘electoral democracy’ to refer to where relatively free and fair elections are held (where opposition parties stand some chance of winning government) but the institutions of a liberal society (like freedom of the press) are not in place. Given this, we consider what level of democracy is necessary before we can expect it to have a positive effect upon governance. We employ a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to construct a new governance indicator. Using the data from over one hundred countries and advanced panel data analysis for the period 1996–2012, our results confirm that political freedom and civil rights influence the level of governance, but this effect is found to be nonlinear. Governance is typically higher in dictatorships than in countries that are partially democratised (electoral democracies). However, once past a threshold, democratic practices assist good governance. Furthermore, it is found that democracy substantially strengthens levels of governance only within the top-half of the conditional distribution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068543349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eap.2019.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.eap.2019.06.005

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 220

EP - 233

JO - Economic Analysis and Policy

JF - Economic Analysis and Policy

SN - 0313-5926

ER -