Abstract
Hilary Putnam and Nelson Goodman are two of the twentieth century's most persuasive critics of metaphysical realism, however they disagree about the consequences of rejecting metaphysical realism. Goodman defended a view he called "irrealism" in which minds literally make worlds, and Putnam has sought to find a middle path between metaphysical realism and irrealism. I argue that Putnam's middle path turns out to be very elusive and defend a dichotomy between metaphysical realism and irrealism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 33-46 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Erkenntnis |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Goodman and Putnam on the making of worlds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver