Abstract
Hilary Putnam and Nelson Goodman are two of the twentieth century's most persuasive critics of metaphysical realism, however they disagree about the consequences of rejecting metaphysical realism. Goodman defended a view he called "irrealism" in which minds literally make worlds, and Putnam has sought to find a middle path between metaphysical realism and irrealism. I argue that Putnam's middle path turns out to be very elusive and defend a dichotomy between metaphysical realism and irrealism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 33-46 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Erkenntnis |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2003 |
Externally published | Yes |