Giving content to general concepts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

General concepts, such as 'reasonableness', 'unconscionable conduct' and 'unfairness', are used in a variety of ways by judges, commentators and in statute. Sometimes, general concepts are merely statements in the nature of a conclusion reached after a process of detailed legal reasoning has taken place. In many cases, however, general concepts themselves play a determinative role in legal analysis, either as an important step in a process of analysis, or else as the sole or central concept determining liability. In such cases, it is of critical importance for the pursuit of open and rational legal reasoning that meaning is given to such concepts. This article explores some of the ways in which general concepts are utilised in legal reasoning and the various ways in which meaning and content can be given to such concepts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-241
Number of pages24
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume29
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

reasonableness
statute
liability

Cite this

@article{1d2746d22add4190af40be305e4c1bd7,
title = "Giving content to general concepts",
abstract = "General concepts, such as 'reasonableness', 'unconscionable conduct' and 'unfairness', are used in a variety of ways by judges, commentators and in statute. Sometimes, general concepts are merely statements in the nature of a conclusion reached after a process of detailed legal reasoning has taken place. In many cases, however, general concepts themselves play a determinative role in legal analysis, either as an important step in a process of analysis, or else as the sole or central concept determining liability. In such cases, it is of critical importance for the pursuit of open and rational legal reasoning that meaning is given to such concepts. This article explores some of the ways in which general concepts are utilised in legal reasoning and the various ways in which meaning and content can be given to such concepts.",
author = "Joachim Dietrich",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "218--241",
journal = "Melbourne University Law Review",
issn = "0025-8938",
publisher = "MELBOURNE UNIV LAW REVIEW ASSOC",
number = "1",

}

Giving content to general concepts. / Dietrich, Joachim.

In: Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.04.2005, p. 218-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Giving content to general concepts

AU - Dietrich, Joachim

PY - 2005/4/1

Y1 - 2005/4/1

N2 - General concepts, such as 'reasonableness', 'unconscionable conduct' and 'unfairness', are used in a variety of ways by judges, commentators and in statute. Sometimes, general concepts are merely statements in the nature of a conclusion reached after a process of detailed legal reasoning has taken place. In many cases, however, general concepts themselves play a determinative role in legal analysis, either as an important step in a process of analysis, or else as the sole or central concept determining liability. In such cases, it is of critical importance for the pursuit of open and rational legal reasoning that meaning is given to such concepts. This article explores some of the ways in which general concepts are utilised in legal reasoning and the various ways in which meaning and content can be given to such concepts.

AB - General concepts, such as 'reasonableness', 'unconscionable conduct' and 'unfairness', are used in a variety of ways by judges, commentators and in statute. Sometimes, general concepts are merely statements in the nature of a conclusion reached after a process of detailed legal reasoning has taken place. In many cases, however, general concepts themselves play a determinative role in legal analysis, either as an important step in a process of analysis, or else as the sole or central concept determining liability. In such cases, it is of critical importance for the pursuit of open and rational legal reasoning that meaning is given to such concepts. This article explores some of the ways in which general concepts are utilised in legal reasoning and the various ways in which meaning and content can be given to such concepts.

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 218

EP - 241

JO - Melbourne University Law Review

JF - Melbourne University Law Review

SN - 0025-8938

IS - 1

ER -