General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: A qualitative study

Carissa Bonner, Jesse Jansen, Shannon McKinn, Les Irwig, Jenny Doust, Paul Glasziou, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten McCaffery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To identify factors that influence the extent to which general practitioners use absolute risk (AR) assessment in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Design, setting and participants: Semi-structured interviews with 25 currently practising GPs from eight Divisions of General Practice in New South Wales, Australia, between October 2011 and May 2012. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: The study identified five strategies that GPs use with patients in different situations, defined in terms of the extent to which AR was used and the reasons given for this: the AR-focused strategy, used when AR assessment was considered useful for the patient; the AR-adjusted strategy, used to account for additional risk factors such as family history; the clinical judgement strategy, used when GPs considered that their judgement took multiple risk factors into account as effectively as AR; the passive disregard strategy, used when GPs lacked sufficient time, access or experience to use AR; and the active disregard strategy, used when AR was considered to be inappropriate for the patient. The strategies were linked with different opportunity, capability and motivation barriers to the use of AR. Conclusions: This study provides an in-depth insight into the factors that influence GPs' use of AR in CVD risk assessment. The results suggest that GPs use a range of strategies in different situations, so different approaches may be required to improve the use of AR guidelines in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-489
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume199
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

General Practitioners
Cardiovascular Diseases
South Australia
New South Wales
Practice Guidelines
General Practice
Motivation
Interviews

Cite this

Bonner, Carissa ; Jansen, Jesse ; McKinn, Shannon ; Irwig, Les ; Doust, Jenny ; Glasziou, Paul ; Hayen, Andrew ; McCaffery, Kirsten. / General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies : A qualitative study. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2013 ; Vol. 199, No. 7. pp. 485-489.
@article{3771be0ff852423aa5b57c530e1a5559,
title = "General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify factors that influence the extent to which general practitioners use absolute risk (AR) assessment in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Design, setting and participants: Semi-structured interviews with 25 currently practising GPs from eight Divisions of General Practice in New South Wales, Australia, between October 2011 and May 2012. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: The study identified five strategies that GPs use with patients in different situations, defined in terms of the extent to which AR was used and the reasons given for this: the AR-focused strategy, used when AR assessment was considered useful for the patient; the AR-adjusted strategy, used to account for additional risk factors such as family history; the clinical judgement strategy, used when GPs considered that their judgement took multiple risk factors into account as effectively as AR; the passive disregard strategy, used when GPs lacked sufficient time, access or experience to use AR; and the active disregard strategy, used when AR was considered to be inappropriate for the patient. The strategies were linked with different opportunity, capability and motivation barriers to the use of AR. Conclusions: This study provides an in-depth insight into the factors that influence GPs' use of AR in CVD risk assessment. The results suggest that GPs use a range of strategies in different situations, so different approaches may be required to improve the use of AR guidelines in practice.",
author = "Carissa Bonner and Jesse Jansen and Shannon McKinn and Les Irwig and Jenny Doust and Paul Glasziou and Andrew Hayen and Kirsten McCaffery",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "7",
doi = "10.5694/mja13.10133",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "485--489",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD",
number = "7",

}

General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies : A qualitative study. / Bonner, Carissa; Jansen, Jesse; McKinn, Shannon; Irwig, Les; Doust, Jenny; Glasziou, Paul; Hayen, Andrew; McCaffery, Kirsten.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 199, No. 7, 07.10.2013, p. 485-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - General practitioners' use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Bonner, Carissa

AU - Jansen, Jesse

AU - McKinn, Shannon

AU - Irwig, Les

AU - Doust, Jenny

AU - Glasziou, Paul

AU - Hayen, Andrew

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten

PY - 2013/10/7

Y1 - 2013/10/7

N2 - Objectives: To identify factors that influence the extent to which general practitioners use absolute risk (AR) assessment in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Design, setting and participants: Semi-structured interviews with 25 currently practising GPs from eight Divisions of General Practice in New South Wales, Australia, between October 2011 and May 2012. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: The study identified five strategies that GPs use with patients in different situations, defined in terms of the extent to which AR was used and the reasons given for this: the AR-focused strategy, used when AR assessment was considered useful for the patient; the AR-adjusted strategy, used to account for additional risk factors such as family history; the clinical judgement strategy, used when GPs considered that their judgement took multiple risk factors into account as effectively as AR; the passive disregard strategy, used when GPs lacked sufficient time, access or experience to use AR; and the active disregard strategy, used when AR was considered to be inappropriate for the patient. The strategies were linked with different opportunity, capability and motivation barriers to the use of AR. Conclusions: This study provides an in-depth insight into the factors that influence GPs' use of AR in CVD risk assessment. The results suggest that GPs use a range of strategies in different situations, so different approaches may be required to improve the use of AR guidelines in practice.

AB - Objectives: To identify factors that influence the extent to which general practitioners use absolute risk (AR) assessment in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Design, setting and participants: Semi-structured interviews with 25 currently practising GPs from eight Divisions of General Practice in New South Wales, Australia, between October 2011 and May 2012. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results: The study identified five strategies that GPs use with patients in different situations, defined in terms of the extent to which AR was used and the reasons given for this: the AR-focused strategy, used when AR assessment was considered useful for the patient; the AR-adjusted strategy, used to account for additional risk factors such as family history; the clinical judgement strategy, used when GPs considered that their judgement took multiple risk factors into account as effectively as AR; the passive disregard strategy, used when GPs lacked sufficient time, access or experience to use AR; and the active disregard strategy, used when AR was considered to be inappropriate for the patient. The strategies were linked with different opportunity, capability and motivation barriers to the use of AR. Conclusions: This study provides an in-depth insight into the factors that influence GPs' use of AR in CVD risk assessment. The results suggest that GPs use a range of strategies in different situations, so different approaches may be required to improve the use of AR guidelines in practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885166063&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5694/mja13.10133

DO - 10.5694/mja13.10133

M3 - Article

VL - 199

SP - 485

EP - 489

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 7

ER -