General Practitioners' Perception of Risk for Travelers Visiting Friends and Relatives

Anita E. Heywood, Bradley L. Forssman, Holly Seale, C. Raina MacIntyre, Nicholas Zwar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background General practitioners (GPs) are an important source of pre-travel health advice for travelers; however, only a few studies have investigated primary healthcare provider-related barriers to the provision of pre-travel health advice, particularly to travelers visiting friends and relatives (VFR). We aimed to investigate Australian GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to VFR travelers. Methods A postal survey was sent to randomly sampled GPs in Sydney, Australia, in 2012. The questionnaire investigated GPs' perception of risk and barriers to the provision of advice to VFR travelers. Results Of 563 GPs, 431 (76.6%) spoke a language other than English (LOTE) with 361 (64.1%) consulting in a LOTE. Overall, 222 (39.4%) GPs considered VFR travelers to be at higher risk than holiday travelers, with GPs consulting in English only [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.44, p=0.01] and GPs considering long-term migrants as VFR travelers (aOR 1.86 95% CI 1.07-3.23, p=0.03) remaining significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Multilingual GPs are a valuable resource to reducing language and cultural barriers to healthcare. Targeted education of this subgroup of GPs may assist in promoting pre-travel health assessments for VFR travelers. Awareness of the need for opportunistic targeting of migrants for pre-travel consultation through routine identification of future travel is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-374
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Travel Medicine
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

General Practitioners
Health
Language
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Communication Barriers
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Holidays
Health Personnel
Primary Health Care
Referral and Consultation
Multivariate Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Education

Cite this

Heywood, Anita E. ; Forssman, Bradley L. ; Seale, Holly ; MacIntyre, C. Raina ; Zwar, Nicholas. / General Practitioners' Perception of Risk for Travelers Visiting Friends and Relatives. In: Journal of Travel Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 368-374.
@article{7075a23b4b804408a5fa7bf2d65c9b5e,
title = "General Practitioners' Perception of Risk for Travelers Visiting Friends and Relatives",
abstract = "Background General practitioners (GPs) are an important source of pre-travel health advice for travelers; however, only a few studies have investigated primary healthcare provider-related barriers to the provision of pre-travel health advice, particularly to travelers visiting friends and relatives (VFR). We aimed to investigate Australian GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to VFR travelers. Methods A postal survey was sent to randomly sampled GPs in Sydney, Australia, in 2012. The questionnaire investigated GPs' perception of risk and barriers to the provision of advice to VFR travelers. Results Of 563 GPs, 431 (76.6{\%}) spoke a language other than English (LOTE) with 361 (64.1{\%}) consulting in a LOTE. Overall, 222 (39.4{\%}) GPs considered VFR travelers to be at higher risk than holiday travelers, with GPs consulting in English only [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.65, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.44, p=0.01] and GPs considering long-term migrants as VFR travelers (aOR 1.86 95{\%} CI 1.07-3.23, p=0.03) remaining significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Multilingual GPs are a valuable resource to reducing language and cultural barriers to healthcare. Targeted education of this subgroup of GPs may assist in promoting pre-travel health assessments for VFR travelers. Awareness of the need for opportunistic targeting of migrants for pre-travel consultation through routine identification of future travel is needed.",
author = "Heywood, {Anita E.} and Forssman, {Bradley L.} and Holly Seale and MacIntyre, {C. Raina} and Nicholas Zwar",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jtm.12229",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "368--374",
journal = "Journal of Travel Medicine",
issn = "1195-1982",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

General Practitioners' Perception of Risk for Travelers Visiting Friends and Relatives. / Heywood, Anita E.; Forssman, Bradley L.; Seale, Holly; MacIntyre, C. Raina; Zwar, Nicholas.

In: Journal of Travel Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 6, 01.01.2015, p. 368-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - General Practitioners' Perception of Risk for Travelers Visiting Friends and Relatives

AU - Heywood, Anita E.

AU - Forssman, Bradley L.

AU - Seale, Holly

AU - MacIntyre, C. Raina

AU - Zwar, Nicholas

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background General practitioners (GPs) are an important source of pre-travel health advice for travelers; however, only a few studies have investigated primary healthcare provider-related barriers to the provision of pre-travel health advice, particularly to travelers visiting friends and relatives (VFR). We aimed to investigate Australian GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to VFR travelers. Methods A postal survey was sent to randomly sampled GPs in Sydney, Australia, in 2012. The questionnaire investigated GPs' perception of risk and barriers to the provision of advice to VFR travelers. Results Of 563 GPs, 431 (76.6%) spoke a language other than English (LOTE) with 361 (64.1%) consulting in a LOTE. Overall, 222 (39.4%) GPs considered VFR travelers to be at higher risk than holiday travelers, with GPs consulting in English only [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.44, p=0.01] and GPs considering long-term migrants as VFR travelers (aOR 1.86 95% CI 1.07-3.23, p=0.03) remaining significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Multilingual GPs are a valuable resource to reducing language and cultural barriers to healthcare. Targeted education of this subgroup of GPs may assist in promoting pre-travel health assessments for VFR travelers. Awareness of the need for opportunistic targeting of migrants for pre-travel consultation through routine identification of future travel is needed.

AB - Background General practitioners (GPs) are an important source of pre-travel health advice for travelers; however, only a few studies have investigated primary healthcare provider-related barriers to the provision of pre-travel health advice, particularly to travelers visiting friends and relatives (VFR). We aimed to investigate Australian GPs' knowledge, attitudes, and practices with regard to VFR travelers. Methods A postal survey was sent to randomly sampled GPs in Sydney, Australia, in 2012. The questionnaire investigated GPs' perception of risk and barriers to the provision of advice to VFR travelers. Results Of 563 GPs, 431 (76.6%) spoke a language other than English (LOTE) with 361 (64.1%) consulting in a LOTE. Overall, 222 (39.4%) GPs considered VFR travelers to be at higher risk than holiday travelers, with GPs consulting in English only [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.44, p=0.01] and GPs considering long-term migrants as VFR travelers (aOR 1.86 95% CI 1.07-3.23, p=0.03) remaining significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Multilingual GPs are a valuable resource to reducing language and cultural barriers to healthcare. Targeted education of this subgroup of GPs may assist in promoting pre-travel health assessments for VFR travelers. Awareness of the need for opportunistic targeting of migrants for pre-travel consultation through routine identification of future travel is needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945128663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jtm.12229

DO - 10.1111/jtm.12229

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 368

EP - 374

JO - Journal of Travel Medicine

JF - Journal of Travel Medicine

SN - 1195-1982

IS - 6

ER -