General practitioner attitudes to case conferences: How can we increase participation and effectiveness?

GK Mitchell, Inge C de Jong, CB Del Mar, Alexandra M Clavarino, Rosemary Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To identify general practitioners' views on the barriers to using case conferencing (as outlined in the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) Enhanced Primary Care package) and to develop a set of principles to encourage greater GP participation in case conferences.

Design: Qualitative study, involving semistructured questions administered to focus groups of GPs, conducted between April and July 2001 as part of a broader study of case coordination in palliative care.

Participants: 29 GPs from urban, regional, and rural areas of Queensland.

Principal findings: Many of the GPs' work practices militated against participation in traditionally structured case conferences. GPs thought the range of MBS item numbers should be expanded to cover alternative methods of liaison (eg, phone consultations with other service providers). The onerous bureaucratic processes required to claim reimbursement were an additional disincentive.

Conclusions: GPs would probably be more likely to participate in case conferences if they were initiated by specialist services and arranged more flexibly to suit GP work schedules.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-97
Number of pages3
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume177
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2002
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Mitchell, GK ; de Jong, Inge C ; Del Mar, CB ; Clavarino, Alexandra M ; Kennedy, Rosemary. / General practitioner attitudes to case conferences : How can we increase participation and effectiveness?. In: Medical Journal of Australia. 2002 ; Vol. 177, No. 2. pp. 95-97.
@article{e408635c60de457eafcc4322e24e2dd6,
title = "General practitioner attitudes to case conferences: How can we increase participation and effectiveness?",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify general practitioners' views on the barriers to using case conferencing (as outlined in the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) Enhanced Primary Care package) and to develop a set of principles to encourage greater GP participation in case conferences.Design: Qualitative study, involving semistructured questions administered to focus groups of GPs, conducted between April and July 2001 as part of a broader study of case coordination in palliative care.Participants: 29 GPs from urban, regional, and rural areas of Queensland.Principal findings: Many of the GPs' work practices militated against participation in traditionally structured case conferences. GPs thought the range of MBS item numbers should be expanded to cover alternative methods of liaison (eg, phone consultations with other service providers). The onerous bureaucratic processes required to claim reimbursement were an additional disincentive.Conclusions: GPs would probably be more likely to participate in case conferences if they were initiated by specialist services and arranged more flexibly to suit GP work schedules.",
author = "GK Mitchell and {de Jong}, {Inge C} and {Del Mar}, CB and Clavarino, {Alexandra M} and Rosemary Kennedy",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "177",
pages = "95--97",
journal = "Medical Journal of Australia",
issn = "0025-729X",
publisher = "AUSTRALASIAN MED PUBL CO LTD",
number = "2",

}

General practitioner attitudes to case conferences : How can we increase participation and effectiveness? / Mitchell, GK; de Jong, Inge C; Del Mar, CB; Clavarino, Alexandra M; Kennedy, Rosemary.

In: Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 177, No. 2, 15.07.2002, p. 95-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - General practitioner attitudes to case conferences

T2 - How can we increase participation and effectiveness?

AU - Mitchell, GK

AU - de Jong, Inge C

AU - Del Mar, CB

AU - Clavarino, Alexandra M

AU - Kennedy, Rosemary

PY - 2002/7/15

Y1 - 2002/7/15

N2 - Objectives: To identify general practitioners' views on the barriers to using case conferencing (as outlined in the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) Enhanced Primary Care package) and to develop a set of principles to encourage greater GP participation in case conferences.Design: Qualitative study, involving semistructured questions administered to focus groups of GPs, conducted between April and July 2001 as part of a broader study of case coordination in palliative care.Participants: 29 GPs from urban, regional, and rural areas of Queensland.Principal findings: Many of the GPs' work practices militated against participation in traditionally structured case conferences. GPs thought the range of MBS item numbers should be expanded to cover alternative methods of liaison (eg, phone consultations with other service providers). The onerous bureaucratic processes required to claim reimbursement were an additional disincentive.Conclusions: GPs would probably be more likely to participate in case conferences if they were initiated by specialist services and arranged more flexibly to suit GP work schedules.

AB - Objectives: To identify general practitioners' views on the barriers to using case conferencing (as outlined in the Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) Enhanced Primary Care package) and to develop a set of principles to encourage greater GP participation in case conferences.Design: Qualitative study, involving semistructured questions administered to focus groups of GPs, conducted between April and July 2001 as part of a broader study of case coordination in palliative care.Participants: 29 GPs from urban, regional, and rural areas of Queensland.Principal findings: Many of the GPs' work practices militated against participation in traditionally structured case conferences. GPs thought the range of MBS item numbers should be expanded to cover alternative methods of liaison (eg, phone consultations with other service providers). The onerous bureaucratic processes required to claim reimbursement were an additional disincentive.Conclusions: GPs would probably be more likely to participate in case conferences if they were initiated by specialist services and arranged more flexibly to suit GP work schedules.

M3 - Article

VL - 177

SP - 95

EP - 97

JO - Medical Journal of Australia

JF - Medical Journal of Australia

SN - 0025-729X

IS - 2

ER -