Gender differences in load carriage injuries of Australian army soldiers

Robin Marc Orr, Rodney Pope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the removal of gender restrictions and the changing nature of warfare potentially increasing female soldier exposure to heavy military load carriage, the aim of this research was to determine relative risks and patterns of load carriage related injuries in female compared to male soldiers.

METHODS: The Australian Defence Force Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting workplace injury database was searched to identify all reported load carriage injuries. Using key search terms, the narrative description fields were used as the search medium to identify records of interest. Population estimates of the female: male incident rate ratio (IRR) were calculated with ninety-five percent confidence interval (95% CI) around the population estimate of each IRR determined.

RESULTS: Female soldiers sustained 10% (n = 40) of the 401 reported injuries, with a female to male IRR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.41). The most common site of injury for both genders was the back (F: n = 11, 27%; M: n = 80, 22%), followed by the foot in female soldiers (n = 8, 20%) and the ankle (n = 60, 17%) in male soldiers. Fifteen percent (n = 6) of injuries in female soldiers and 6% (n = 23) of injuries in males were classified as Serious Personal Injuries (SPI) with the lower back the leading site for both genders (F: n = 3, 43%: M: n = 8, 29%). The injury risk ratio of SPI for female compared to male soldiers was 2.40 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.88).

CONCLUSIONS: While both genders similarly have the lower back as the leading site of injury while carrying load, female soldiers have more injuries to the foot as the second leading site of injury, as opposed to ankle injuries in males. The typically smaller statures of female soldiers may have predisposed them to their observed higher risk of suffering SPI while carrying loads.

Original languageEnglish
Article number488
Pages (from-to)488
Number of pages8
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Military Personnel
Wounds and Injuries
Occupational Health
Foot Injuries
Ankle Injuries
Ankle
Workplace
Population
Foot
Odds Ratio

Cite this

@article{af20e58d7d4c496b8b073ddafcef6d5e,
title = "Gender differences in load carriage injuries of Australian army soldiers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: With the removal of gender restrictions and the changing nature of warfare potentially increasing female soldier exposure to heavy military load carriage, the aim of this research was to determine relative risks and patterns of load carriage related injuries in female compared to male soldiers.METHODS: The Australian Defence Force Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting workplace injury database was searched to identify all reported load carriage injuries. Using key search terms, the narrative description fields were used as the search medium to identify records of interest. Population estimates of the female: male incident rate ratio (IRR) were calculated with ninety-five percent confidence interval (95{\%} CI) around the population estimate of each IRR determined.RESULTS: Female soldiers sustained 10{\%} (n = 40) of the 401 reported injuries, with a female to male IRR of 1.02 (95{\%} CI 0.74 to 1.41). The most common site of injury for both genders was the back (F: n = 11, 27{\%}; M: n = 80, 22{\%}), followed by the foot in female soldiers (n = 8, 20{\%}) and the ankle (n = 60, 17{\%}) in male soldiers. Fifteen percent (n = 6) of injuries in female soldiers and 6{\%} (n = 23) of injuries in males were classified as Serious Personal Injuries (SPI) with the lower back the leading site for both genders (F: n = 3, 43{\%}: M: n = 8, 29{\%}). The injury risk ratio of SPI for female compared to male soldiers was 2.40 (95{\%} CI 0.98 to 5.88).CONCLUSIONS: While both genders similarly have the lower back as the leading site of injury while carrying load, female soldiers have more injuries to the foot as the second leading site of injury, as opposed to ankle injuries in males. The typically smaller statures of female soldiers may have predisposed them to their observed higher risk of suffering SPI while carrying loads.",
author = "Orr, {Robin Marc} and Rodney Pope",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/s12891-016-1340-0",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "488",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BMC",
number = "1",

}

Gender differences in load carriage injuries of Australian army soldiers. / Orr, Robin Marc; Pope, Rodney.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 17, No. 1, 488, 25.11.2016, p. 488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in load carriage injuries of Australian army soldiers

AU - Orr, Robin Marc

AU - Pope, Rodney

PY - 2016/11/25

Y1 - 2016/11/25

N2 - BACKGROUND: With the removal of gender restrictions and the changing nature of warfare potentially increasing female soldier exposure to heavy military load carriage, the aim of this research was to determine relative risks and patterns of load carriage related injuries in female compared to male soldiers.METHODS: The Australian Defence Force Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting workplace injury database was searched to identify all reported load carriage injuries. Using key search terms, the narrative description fields were used as the search medium to identify records of interest. Population estimates of the female: male incident rate ratio (IRR) were calculated with ninety-five percent confidence interval (95% CI) around the population estimate of each IRR determined.RESULTS: Female soldiers sustained 10% (n = 40) of the 401 reported injuries, with a female to male IRR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.41). The most common site of injury for both genders was the back (F: n = 11, 27%; M: n = 80, 22%), followed by the foot in female soldiers (n = 8, 20%) and the ankle (n = 60, 17%) in male soldiers. Fifteen percent (n = 6) of injuries in female soldiers and 6% (n = 23) of injuries in males were classified as Serious Personal Injuries (SPI) with the lower back the leading site for both genders (F: n = 3, 43%: M: n = 8, 29%). The injury risk ratio of SPI for female compared to male soldiers was 2.40 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.88).CONCLUSIONS: While both genders similarly have the lower back as the leading site of injury while carrying load, female soldiers have more injuries to the foot as the second leading site of injury, as opposed to ankle injuries in males. The typically smaller statures of female soldiers may have predisposed them to their observed higher risk of suffering SPI while carrying loads.

AB - BACKGROUND: With the removal of gender restrictions and the changing nature of warfare potentially increasing female soldier exposure to heavy military load carriage, the aim of this research was to determine relative risks and patterns of load carriage related injuries in female compared to male soldiers.METHODS: The Australian Defence Force Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting workplace injury database was searched to identify all reported load carriage injuries. Using key search terms, the narrative description fields were used as the search medium to identify records of interest. Population estimates of the female: male incident rate ratio (IRR) were calculated with ninety-five percent confidence interval (95% CI) around the population estimate of each IRR determined.RESULTS: Female soldiers sustained 10% (n = 40) of the 401 reported injuries, with a female to male IRR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.41). The most common site of injury for both genders was the back (F: n = 11, 27%; M: n = 80, 22%), followed by the foot in female soldiers (n = 8, 20%) and the ankle (n = 60, 17%) in male soldiers. Fifteen percent (n = 6) of injuries in female soldiers and 6% (n = 23) of injuries in males were classified as Serious Personal Injuries (SPI) with the lower back the leading site for both genders (F: n = 3, 43%: M: n = 8, 29%). The injury risk ratio of SPI for female compared to male soldiers was 2.40 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.88).CONCLUSIONS: While both genders similarly have the lower back as the leading site of injury while carrying load, female soldiers have more injuries to the foot as the second leading site of injury, as opposed to ankle injuries in males. The typically smaller statures of female soldiers may have predisposed them to their observed higher risk of suffering SPI while carrying loads.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996805788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12891-016-1340-0

DO - 10.1186/s12891-016-1340-0

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 488

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

IS - 1

M1 - 488

ER -