Gatecrashing the research paradigm: Effective integration of online technologies in maximising research impact and engagement in legal education

Kathrine Galloway, Greaves Kristoffer, Melissa Castan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Legal academics are not only teachers but also creators of knowledge. The role of an academic includes a responsibility to share this knowledge through engagement not just of their students, but also of the wider community. In addition, there is increasing emphasis on legal academics having to account for the so-called ‘impact’ of research. In selecting both the topic of their research and the mode of publication of their knowledge, legal academics act as gatekeepers. There is an increasing critique of the existing paradigm of research publication and its emphasis on the metrics of impact. This critique recognises the limitations of the commercial publication paradigm in the present context of open access and the vast array of citizen-mediated platforms for dissemination of legal knowledge and innovation. Susskind (Tomorrow’s Lawyers 2013) for example identifies expert crowd-sourced legal information as breaking down barriers to access to justice. Tracking their experience with publication of a paper on social media in legal education from the ALTA conference in 2012, the authors share an auto-ethnographic account of their insights into the potential for both impact and engagement of a diverse audience in their research. This highlights the ways in which various media can be used strategically to redefine the role of the gatekeeper.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-91
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association
Volume6
Issue number1&2
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

impact research
paradigm
gatekeeper
education
open access
social media
lawyer
justice
expert
citizen
innovation
responsibility
teacher
community
experience
student

Cite this

@article{76544949691e4540ac2e8bbd5717fb59,
title = "Gatecrashing the research paradigm: Effective integration of online technologies in maximising research impact and engagement in legal education",
abstract = "Legal academics are not only teachers but also creators of knowledge. The role of an academic includes a responsibility to share this knowledge through engagement not just of their students, but also of the wider community. In addition, there is increasing emphasis on legal academics having to account for the so-called {\^a}€˜impact{\^a}€™ of research. In selecting both the topic of their research and the mode of publication of their knowledge, legal academics act as gatekeepers. There is an increasing critique of the existing paradigm of research publication and its emphasis on the metrics of impact. This critique recognises the limitations of the commercial publication paradigm in the present context of open access and the vast array of citizen-mediated platforms for dissemination of legal knowledge and innovation. Susskind (Tomorrow{\^a}€™s Lawyers 2013) for example identifies expert crowd-sourced legal information as breaking down barriers to access to justice. Tracking their experience with publication of a paper on social media in legal education from the ALTA conference in 2012, the authors share an auto-ethnographic account of their insights into the potential for both impact and engagement of a diverse audience in their research. This highlights the ways in which various media can be used strategically to redefine the role of the gatekeeper.",
author = "Kathrine Galloway and Greaves Kristoffer and Melissa Castan",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "83--91",
journal = "Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association",
issn = "1836-5612",
publisher = "Walters Kluwer",
number = "1&2",

}

Gatecrashing the research paradigm : Effective integration of online technologies in maximising research impact and engagement in legal education. / Galloway, Kathrine; Kristoffer, Greaves; Castan, Melissa.

In: Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, Vol. 6, No. 1&2, 2013, p. 83-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gatecrashing the research paradigm

T2 - Effective integration of online technologies in maximising research impact and engagement in legal education

AU - Galloway, Kathrine

AU - Kristoffer, Greaves

AU - Castan, Melissa

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Legal academics are not only teachers but also creators of knowledge. The role of an academic includes a responsibility to share this knowledge through engagement not just of their students, but also of the wider community. In addition, there is increasing emphasis on legal academics having to account for the so-called ‘impact’ of research. In selecting both the topic of their research and the mode of publication of their knowledge, legal academics act as gatekeepers. There is an increasing critique of the existing paradigm of research publication and its emphasis on the metrics of impact. This critique recognises the limitations of the commercial publication paradigm in the present context of open access and the vast array of citizen-mediated platforms for dissemination of legal knowledge and innovation. Susskind (Tomorrow’s Lawyers 2013) for example identifies expert crowd-sourced legal information as breaking down barriers to access to justice. Tracking their experience with publication of a paper on social media in legal education from the ALTA conference in 2012, the authors share an auto-ethnographic account of their insights into the potential for both impact and engagement of a diverse audience in their research. This highlights the ways in which various media can be used strategically to redefine the role of the gatekeeper.

AB - Legal academics are not only teachers but also creators of knowledge. The role of an academic includes a responsibility to share this knowledge through engagement not just of their students, but also of the wider community. In addition, there is increasing emphasis on legal academics having to account for the so-called ‘impact’ of research. In selecting both the topic of their research and the mode of publication of their knowledge, legal academics act as gatekeepers. There is an increasing critique of the existing paradigm of research publication and its emphasis on the metrics of impact. This critique recognises the limitations of the commercial publication paradigm in the present context of open access and the vast array of citizen-mediated platforms for dissemination of legal knowledge and innovation. Susskind (Tomorrow’s Lawyers 2013) for example identifies expert crowd-sourced legal information as breaking down barriers to access to justice. Tracking their experience with publication of a paper on social media in legal education from the ALTA conference in 2012, the authors share an auto-ethnographic account of their insights into the potential for both impact and engagement of a diverse audience in their research. This highlights the ways in which various media can be used strategically to redefine the role of the gatekeeper.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 83

EP - 91

JO - Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association

JF - Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association

SN - 1836-5612

IS - 1&2

ER -