Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

From anthelmintic to neuro‐oncology: A systematic review of mebendazole repurposing for brain tumour therapy

  • Ciara B. Blum
  • , Milli McMenamin
  • , Tessa Khoo
  • , John M. Edwin
  • , Prathibha Jose
  • , Liam A. O’Callaghan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim:
Mebendazole (MBZ), a benzimidazole anthelmintic with established clinical use, has emerged as a repurposing candidate for primary brain tumours due to its multimodal anticancer actions and central nervous system penetrance. This systematic review synthesizes preclinical and clinical evidence evaluating MBZ's efficacy, mechanisms of action and translational relevance.

Methods:
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science using predefined eligibility criteria. A total of 22 studies were included (17 preclinical and five clinical/population).

Results:
Preclinical work across glioblastoma, diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma and meningioma demonstrates consistent tumour growth suppression and survival extension via microtubule depolymerization, kinase inhibition, angiogenesis blockade, Hedgehog pathway interference, apoptosis/pyroptosis induction and impairment of DNA repair. MBZ also potentiates standard therapies, enhancing the effects of alkylators, radiotherapy and autophagy inhibitors. Efficacy was influenced by formulation, with polymorph C demonstrating superior brain penetration and tolerability. Additional delivery strategies, including efflux inhibition, intranasal microemulsions and nanosuspensions, further improved exposure. Clinically, MBZ was generally tolerable at high oral doses in early-phase studies, but evidence of efficacy remained modest, inconsistent and inconclusive.

Conclusion:
MBZ shows broad preclinical anticancer activity and acceptable tolerability in early human studies, but current clinical evidence does not demonstrate meaningful efficacy in brain tumour patients. Further well-designed comparative trials with clear formulation reporting and integrated pharmacokinetic and biomarker analyses are needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From anthelmintic to neuro‐oncology: A systematic review of mebendazole repurposing for brain tumour therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this