TY - JOUR
T1 - Four strikes and you're out: Adidas covering their bases with trade marks protection
AU - Van Caenegem, William
AU - Atkinson, Violet
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Takeaway tips• When considering whether a registered mark isused “as a mark” or merely as a decorative feature,evidence that consumers have become accustomedto seeing trade marks in the same position onproducts of that kind will support a finding of useas a mark.• Even if the registered trade mark consists of threestripes, and is well-known among consumers, fourstripes can be held to be deceptively similar if theyare placed in a similar configuration.• It is the similarity in the overall configuration ofthe stripes rather than the number that is crucial inthe test of deceptive similarity.• In essence, the test of deceptive similarity requiresa comparison of the marks themselves, but “relevantcontext” can also be taken into account, inparticular what the marks are applied to, and thecircumstances in which the marks will be observedand compared.• Survey evidence that is not “ecologically valid”and evidence tending to show only a generalintention to “sail close to the wind” is of littleassistance to the court.
AB - Takeaway tips• When considering whether a registered mark isused “as a mark” or merely as a decorative feature,evidence that consumers have become accustomedto seeing trade marks in the same position onproducts of that kind will support a finding of useas a mark.• Even if the registered trade mark consists of threestripes, and is well-known among consumers, fourstripes can be held to be deceptively similar if theyare placed in a similar configuration.• It is the similarity in the overall configuration ofthe stripes rather than the number that is crucial inthe test of deceptive similarity.• In essence, the test of deceptive similarity requiresa comparison of the marks themselves, but “relevantcontext” can also be taken into account, inparticular what the marks are applied to, and thecircumstances in which the marks will be observedand compared.• Survey evidence that is not “ecologically valid”and evidence tending to show only a generalintention to “sail close to the wind” is of littleassistance to the court.
M3 - Article
SN - 1035-1353
VL - 30
SP - 122
EP - 127
JO - Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin
JF - Australian Intellectual Property Law Bulletin
IS - 6
ER -