Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forum response

  • Kellie Pollard*
  • , Craig Taylor
  • , Nicolas J. Bullot
  • , Stephen Enciso
  • , Oscar Davis
  • , Claire Smith
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate/opinionResearch

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Thank you to the authors of the comments on our Forum Article Voice: A Third Space in Archaeology to Advance Indigenous Emancipation, for their praise and constructive comments. We note the overwhelmingly positive receipt of our Forum Article, and we welcome the range of constructive critiques. In our response below, we selectively address those comments that are most conducive to deepening future work related to Voice. In the spirit of Voice, Australian Archaeology, sought and obtained a review by a community-based Aboriginal organisation. This is critical to strengthening local Indigenous Voices and ensuring academic research becomes more accessible to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community organisations. This diversifies the content of Australian Archaeology and averts epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by Miranda Fricker (Citation2007). Fricker (Citation2007:69) defines epistemic injustice as the wrong that occurs when a testimony to something is received with doubt due to the prejudice or bias of the receiver of the testimony, for example, in the context of a litigated dispute.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-2
Number of pages2
JournalAustralian Archaeology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forum response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this